Epidemiological Correlates of Contraceptive Prevalence in Rural Area of Haryana

S. Seema, S. Neelu, C. Seema, Gaur Dr, P. Mani, Kalhan Meenakshi
{"title":"Epidemiological Correlates of Contraceptive Prevalence in Rural Area of Haryana","authors":"S. Seema, S. Neelu, C. Seema, Gaur Dr, P. Mani, Kalhan Meenakshi","doi":"10.5580/1ff7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: 1. To study the prevalence of contraceptive utilization with its socio-demographic variables in a rural area of Haryana. Study Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Agroha village Participants: 260 eligible couples Methodology: The minimum sample size to be covered was derived on the basis of current contraceptive prevalence rate of rural Haryana ie. 62% (as per National Family Health Survey III – 2005-06). For the purpose of the study, 260 eligible couples were selected by simple random sampling. Complete data was collected in a pre-designed, pre-tested quesionnaire. Statistical Analysis: The data collected were analyzed by using percentages and chi-square test. Result: Out of 260 couples selected for the study, 10 couples were non willing. Out of 250 eligible couples, 59.2% were current users of contraception (terminal methods users 46% & spacing method users 13.2%). Contraceptive prevalence increased significantly (p <0.001) with increasing age and also with the literacy status of the women ( 38.5% in illiterate women to 65.0% in women educated to high school & above). Caste-wise, the highest current contraceptive prevalence was found among the Other castes (74.6%) followed by OBCs (46.5%) and SCs (46.0%)(p < 0.001). Current contraceptive prevalence among women of nuclear families was higher (87.0%) than women in joint families (40.7%) & the difference was statistically significant (p <0.001). Current contraceptive prevalence was found to decrease with the increase of socio-economic status as the prevalence was 72.6% in class V (Lower Class) and progressively declined to 47.6% in the class I (Upper Class) (p <0.05). Conclusion: Preference of terminal sterilization methods over spacing methods observed in the present study as a family planning approach needs special attention and there is a need to shift women centric approach to couple centric approach for family planning. Extensive mass awareness campaign at regional level about types, advantages, availability and use of spacing methods is required and locally field workers need to apply Behavior Change Communication (BCC) methods to motivate the couples to accept the spacing methods for better maternal and child health.","PeriodicalId":89628,"journal":{"name":"The Internet journal of mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet journal of mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/1ff7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: 1. To study the prevalence of contraceptive utilization with its socio-demographic variables in a rural area of Haryana. Study Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Agroha village Participants: 260 eligible couples Methodology: The minimum sample size to be covered was derived on the basis of current contraceptive prevalence rate of rural Haryana ie. 62% (as per National Family Health Survey III – 2005-06). For the purpose of the study, 260 eligible couples were selected by simple random sampling. Complete data was collected in a pre-designed, pre-tested quesionnaire. Statistical Analysis: The data collected were analyzed by using percentages and chi-square test. Result: Out of 260 couples selected for the study, 10 couples were non willing. Out of 250 eligible couples, 59.2% were current users of contraception (terminal methods users 46% & spacing method users 13.2%). Contraceptive prevalence increased significantly (p <0.001) with increasing age and also with the literacy status of the women ( 38.5% in illiterate women to 65.0% in women educated to high school & above). Caste-wise, the highest current contraceptive prevalence was found among the Other castes (74.6%) followed by OBCs (46.5%) and SCs (46.0%)(p < 0.001). Current contraceptive prevalence among women of nuclear families was higher (87.0%) than women in joint families (40.7%) & the difference was statistically significant (p <0.001). Current contraceptive prevalence was found to decrease with the increase of socio-economic status as the prevalence was 72.6% in class V (Lower Class) and progressively declined to 47.6% in the class I (Upper Class) (p <0.05). Conclusion: Preference of terminal sterilization methods over spacing methods observed in the present study as a family planning approach needs special attention and there is a need to shift women centric approach to couple centric approach for family planning. Extensive mass awareness campaign at regional level about types, advantages, availability and use of spacing methods is required and locally field workers need to apply Behavior Change Communication (BCC) methods to motivate the couples to accept the spacing methods for better maternal and child health.
哈里亚纳邦农村地区避孕流行病学相关性研究
目的:1。研究哈里亚纳邦农村地区避孕药具使用率及其社会人口变量。研究设计:横断面。方法:将涵盖的最小样本量是根据哈里亚纳邦农村目前的避孕普及率得出的。62%(根据2005- 2006年第三次全国家庭健康调查)。为了研究的目的,通过简单的随机抽样,选择了260对符合条件的夫妇。完整的数据收集在预先设计、预先测试的问卷中。统计分析:收集的资料采用百分数和卡方检验进行分析。结果:在260对夫妇中,有10对夫妇不愿意。在250对符合条件的夫妇中,59.2%目前使用避孕措施(终端方法使用者46%和间隔方法使用者13.2%)。避孕普及率随着年龄的增长和妇女的文化程度而显著增加(p <0.001)(文盲妇女为38.5%,高中及以上教育妇女为65.0%)。就种姓而言,目前避孕普及率最高的是其他种姓(74.6%),其次是OBCs(46.5%)和SCs (46.0%)(p < 0.001)。核心家庭妇女目前避孕普及率(87.0%)高于联合家庭妇女(40.7%),差异有统计学意义(p <0.001)。当前避孕普及率随着社会经济地位的提高而下降,V级(下层)为72.6%,I级(上层)为47.6% (p <0.05)。结论:本研究中观察到的绝育方法对间隔方法的偏好需要引起特别关注,计划生育需要从以妇女为中心转向以夫妇为中心。需要在区域一级就间隔方法的类型、优点、可得性和使用进行广泛的群众宣传运动,当地实地工作人员需要采用改变行为的沟通方法,以激励夫妇接受间隔方法,以改善孕产妇和儿童健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信