The Regulation of Injunctive Relief on Standard Essential Patents Within China’s Anti-monopoly Law

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Yuting Wang
{"title":"The Regulation of Injunctive Relief on Standard Essential Patents Within China’s Anti-monopoly Law","authors":"Yuting Wang","doi":"10.54648/woco2020025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competition concerns arising from the seeking of injunctions by FRAND-encumbered (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) standard essential patent (SEP) owners have become a contentious issue. This issue has attracted the attention of many competition enforcement authorities and no consensus is reached as to the compatibility of such injunctive relief with competition law. This is also a hard and challenging problem faced by China. A coherent and balanced response is urgently needed under current China’s legal framework. Therefore, this article proposes that a basic regulating approach should be established first to treat the seeking of injunctions by FRAND-encumbered SEP owners as an independent anti-competitive practice prohibited by the Anti-monopoly Law. Then, an analysis framework should be established to consider the circumstances in which and the extent to which such seeking of injunctions should be limited from the perspective of competition enforcement. The behaviour of both SEP owners and SEP users should be properly examined.\nstandard, standard essential patent (SEP), injunctive relief, injunction, competition, antitrust, Anti-monopoly law, competition law, fair, reasonable and non- discriminatory (FRAND), reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND).","PeriodicalId":43861,"journal":{"name":"World Competition","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Competition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2020025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Competition concerns arising from the seeking of injunctions by FRAND-encumbered (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) standard essential patent (SEP) owners have become a contentious issue. This issue has attracted the attention of many competition enforcement authorities and no consensus is reached as to the compatibility of such injunctive relief with competition law. This is also a hard and challenging problem faced by China. A coherent and balanced response is urgently needed under current China’s legal framework. Therefore, this article proposes that a basic regulating approach should be established first to treat the seeking of injunctions by FRAND-encumbered SEP owners as an independent anti-competitive practice prohibited by the Anti-monopoly Law. Then, an analysis framework should be established to consider the circumstances in which and the extent to which such seeking of injunctions should be limited from the perspective of competition enforcement. The behaviour of both SEP owners and SEP users should be properly examined. standard, standard essential patent (SEP), injunctive relief, injunction, competition, antitrust, Anti-monopoly law, competition law, fair, reasonable and non- discriminatory (FRAND), reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND).
中国《反垄断法》对标准必要专利禁令救济的规制
公平、合理和非歧视的标准必要专利(SEP)所有人寻求禁令所引起的竞争问题已经成为一个有争议的问题。这一问题引起了许多竞争执法机构的注意,对于这种禁令救济与竞争法的兼容性没有达成共识。这也是中国面临的一个难题和挑战。在中国目前的法律框架下,迫切需要一个连贯而平衡的应对措施。因此,本文建议首先建立一个基本的规制途径,将自有商标权利人寻求禁令作为反垄断法所禁止的一种独立的反竞争行为。然后,应该建立一个分析框架,从竞争执法的角度考虑这种禁令的寻求应该受到限制的情况和程度。应适当审查SEP拥有人和SEP使用者的行为。标准,标准必要专利(SEP),禁令救济,禁令,竞争,反垄断,反垄断法,竞争法,公平,合理和非歧视(FRAND),合理和非歧视(RAND)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信