{"title":"Esther Clark Wright and Recent Themes in Historiography","authors":"Keith Grant","doi":"10.1353/ACA.2018.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I FIRST “MET” ESTHER CLARK WRIGHT WHEN SHE WAS A STUDENT at Acadia, and by reading her love letters. During the two years that I worked as an archival assistant in the Esther Clark Wright Archives, 1995-1996, her voluminous papers were being sorted on long rows of shelving, and I had occasion to look for class photos or to read letters from Conrad that, at least in my memory, all began with, “My Dear Girl.” We in the archives spoke of “Esther” with the fondness born of daily acquaintance. However, my topic here is endnotes rather than love notes, and historiography rather than class photographs. I have been asked to share a few comments on the ongoing relevance of Esther Clark Wright’s work from the perspective of my doctoral research on religious communities in Planter and Loyalist Nova Scotia. I am sure I am not the only researcher who has dog-eared the endnotes section of Wright’s books. Many of us have benefitted from her diligent work in the archives, sliding our fingers down the page with an eye to locating good sources for our own research projects. I suspect that it’s during the research stage of our work that many of us are grateful for Wright’s books, even if we make use of the archival sources for quite different projects than her own. We are perhaps less likely to ask Wright to help us with the interpretive or historiographic aspects of our writing. I did a very selective survey of books on Loyalists, looking for Wright in the notes or index. You will probably not be surprised to know that it was mostly historians of (and from) this region who cited Wright, while her books were mostly absent from broader and more recent studies. Nevertheless, I would like to suggest a few ways that aspects of Wright’s work continue to resonate with several themes in subsequent historiography. I will organize my remarks around four themes: Planters, Loyalists, lived religion, and bodies of water.","PeriodicalId":36377,"journal":{"name":"Regioni","volume":"17 1","pages":"120 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regioni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ACA.2018.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
I FIRST “MET” ESTHER CLARK WRIGHT WHEN SHE WAS A STUDENT at Acadia, and by reading her love letters. During the two years that I worked as an archival assistant in the Esther Clark Wright Archives, 1995-1996, her voluminous papers were being sorted on long rows of shelving, and I had occasion to look for class photos or to read letters from Conrad that, at least in my memory, all began with, “My Dear Girl.” We in the archives spoke of “Esther” with the fondness born of daily acquaintance. However, my topic here is endnotes rather than love notes, and historiography rather than class photographs. I have been asked to share a few comments on the ongoing relevance of Esther Clark Wright’s work from the perspective of my doctoral research on religious communities in Planter and Loyalist Nova Scotia. I am sure I am not the only researcher who has dog-eared the endnotes section of Wright’s books. Many of us have benefitted from her diligent work in the archives, sliding our fingers down the page with an eye to locating good sources for our own research projects. I suspect that it’s during the research stage of our work that many of us are grateful for Wright’s books, even if we make use of the archival sources for quite different projects than her own. We are perhaps less likely to ask Wright to help us with the interpretive or historiographic aspects of our writing. I did a very selective survey of books on Loyalists, looking for Wright in the notes or index. You will probably not be surprised to know that it was mostly historians of (and from) this region who cited Wright, while her books were mostly absent from broader and more recent studies. Nevertheless, I would like to suggest a few ways that aspects of Wright’s work continue to resonate with several themes in subsequent historiography. I will organize my remarks around four themes: Planters, Loyalists, lived religion, and bodies of water.
我第一次“遇见”埃丝特·克拉克·赖特是在她还是阿卡迪亚大学的一名学生的时候,我读了她的情书。1995年至1996年,我在埃丝特·克拉克·赖特档案馆(Esther Clark Wright Archives)担任档案助理的两年时间里,她的大量文件被整理在长长的架子上,我偶尔会寻找班级照片,或者阅读康拉德的来信,至少在我的记忆中,这些信都是以“我亲爱的女孩”开头的。我们这些档案馆的人说起“埃丝特”时,带着日常相识所产生的喜爱。然而,我在这里的主题是尾注,而不是爱情笔记,和历史,而不是班级照片。我被要求从我对新斯科舍省Planter和loyalists的宗教社区的博士研究的角度,分享一些关于埃丝特·克拉克·赖特(Esther Clark Wright)的工作正在进行的相关性的评论。我敢肯定,我不是唯一一个把赖特书的尾注部分弄皱的研究者。我们中的许多人都从她在档案方面的勤奋工作中受益,我们的手指滑动到页面上,为我们自己的研究项目找到好的资源。我怀疑,正是在我们工作的研究阶段,我们中的许多人对赖特的书心存感激,即使我们使用的档案资源与她自己的项目完全不同。我们或许不太可能请赖特在我们的作品的解释性或史学方面帮助我们。我对有关保皇派的书籍做了一个非常有选择性的调查,在注释或索引中寻找赖特。你可能不会感到惊讶的是,主要是该地区的历史学家(或来自该地区的历史学家)引用了赖特,而她的书在更广泛和更近期的研究中大多缺席。尽管如此,我还是想提出赖特作品的一些方面继续与后来的历史编纂中的几个主题产生共鸣。我将围绕四个主题组织我的发言:种植园主、保皇派、生活宗教和水体。