Political and Institutional Approaches to Advancing International Religious Freedom in the U.S. Foreign Policy in 1998–2020

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
V. A. Shchipkov
{"title":"Political and Institutional Approaches to Advancing International Religious Freedom in the U.S. Foreign Policy in 1998–2020","authors":"V. A. Shchipkov","doi":"10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-150-181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article traces the institutional and political evolution of the US implementing its concept of international religious freedom from 1998 to 2020. The concept became popular after the end of the Cold War when the defense of religion against socialistatheist ideas had lost its relevance due to political (the collapse of the Eastern bloc) and cultural (the growing importance of religion in many non-Western countries of the world) reasons. The article starts by reviewing the history of the emergence and development of the institutional infrastructure (legal acts, administrative entities, public and political organizations, think tanks, expert platforms, interdepartmental coordination formats, human rights projects, funding and grant programs, and new international organizations) that supported the US foreign policy advancing international religious freedom. The article divides the reconstruction of this process into two periods formed by adopting two acts: in 1998 — the International Religious Freedom Act, and in 2016 — the amendment to this Act named after congressman Frank Wolf. The study concludes that over the past twenty years, religion has finally developed as an independent track of the US foreign policy, although it has been developing inconsistently and has undergone repeated corrections. The concept of international religious freedom has become the ideational basis of this track, while the extensive institutional and political infrastructure serves as its apparatus. More than 80 percent of the world's population encounters religious persecution. It legitimizes the concept, which encourages widespread support for religious minorities as opposed to the religious majority, and opens the way for the US to build sustainable ties with religious communities and their leaders worldwide, allowing them to influence political processes in different regions. The US has recently promoted the integration of this policy track into international institutions, establishing the International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance.","PeriodicalId":42127,"journal":{"name":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","volume":"224 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-150-181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article traces the institutional and political evolution of the US implementing its concept of international religious freedom from 1998 to 2020. The concept became popular after the end of the Cold War when the defense of religion against socialistatheist ideas had lost its relevance due to political (the collapse of the Eastern bloc) and cultural (the growing importance of religion in many non-Western countries of the world) reasons. The article starts by reviewing the history of the emergence and development of the institutional infrastructure (legal acts, administrative entities, public and political organizations, think tanks, expert platforms, interdepartmental coordination formats, human rights projects, funding and grant programs, and new international organizations) that supported the US foreign policy advancing international religious freedom. The article divides the reconstruction of this process into two periods formed by adopting two acts: in 1998 — the International Religious Freedom Act, and in 2016 — the amendment to this Act named after congressman Frank Wolf. The study concludes that over the past twenty years, religion has finally developed as an independent track of the US foreign policy, although it has been developing inconsistently and has undergone repeated corrections. The concept of international religious freedom has become the ideational basis of this track, while the extensive institutional and political infrastructure serves as its apparatus. More than 80 percent of the world's population encounters religious persecution. It legitimizes the concept, which encourages widespread support for religious minorities as opposed to the religious majority, and opens the way for the US to build sustainable ties with religious communities and their leaders worldwide, allowing them to influence political processes in different regions. The US has recently promoted the integration of this policy track into international institutions, establishing the International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance.
1998-2020年美国外交政策中促进国际宗教自由的政治和制度方法
本文追溯了1998年至2020年美国实施其国际宗教自由理念的制度和政治演变。这个概念在冷战结束后开始流行,当时由于政治(东方集团的崩溃)和文化(宗教在世界上许多非西方国家日益重要)的原因,宗教对社会主义无神论思想的辩护失去了相关性。本文首先回顾了支持美国外交政策促进国际宗教自由的制度基础设施(法律行为、行政实体、公共和政治组织、智库、专家平台、部门间协调形式、人权项目、资助和赠款计划以及新的国际组织)的出现和发展的历史。本文将这一过程的重建分为两个时期,通过了两个法案:1998年-国际宗教自由法案,以及2016年-以国会议员弗兰克·沃尔夫命名的该法案修正案。该研究的结论是,在过去的20年里,宗教最终发展成为美国外交政策的一个独立轨道,尽管它的发展并不一致,并且经历了反复的修正。国际宗教自由的概念已成为这一轨道的思想基础,而广泛的体制和政治基础结构则是这一轨道的工具。世界上80%以上的人口遭受宗教迫害。它使这一概念合法化,鼓励对宗教少数群体而不是宗教多数群体的广泛支持,并为美国与世界各地的宗教团体及其领导人建立可持续的关系开辟了道路,使他们能够影响不同地区的政治进程。美国最近推动将这一政策纳入国际机构,建立了国际宗教自由或信仰联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MGIMO Review of International Relations
MGIMO Review of International Relations INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信