Potential Policies and Laws to Prohibit Weight Discrimination: Public Views from 4 Countries.

R. Puhl, J. Latner, K. O’Brien, J. Luedicke, Sigrún Daníelsdóttir, X. R. Salas
{"title":"Potential Policies and Laws to Prohibit Weight Discrimination: Public Views from 4 Countries.","authors":"R. Puhl, J. Latner, K. O’Brien, J. Luedicke, Sigrún Daníelsdóttir, X. R. Salas","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nPeople viewed as \"overweight\" or \"obese\" are vulnerable to weight-based discrimination, creating inequities and adverse health outcomes. Given the high rates of obesity recorded globally, studies documenting weight discrimination in multiple countries, and an absence of legislation to address this form of discrimination, research examining policy remedies across different countries is needed. Our study provides the first multinational examination of public support for policies and legislation to prohibit weight discrimination.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIdentical online surveys were completed by 2,866 adults in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Iceland. We assessed public support for potential laws to prohibit weight-based discrimination, such as adding body weight to existing civil rights statutes, extending disability protections to persons with obesity, and instituting legal measures to prohibit employers from discriminating against employees because of body weight. We examined sociodemographic and weight-related characteristics predicting support for antidiscrimination policies, and the differences in these patterns across countries.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nThe majority of participants in the United States, Canada, and Australia agreed that their government should have specific laws in place to prohibit weight discrimination. At least two-thirds of the participants in all 4 countries expressed support for policies that would make it illegal for employers to refuse to hire, assign lower wages, deny promotions, or terminate qualified employees because of body weight. Women and participants with higher body weight expressed more support for antidiscrimination measures. Beliefs about the causes of obesity were also related to support for these laws.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPublic support for legal measures to prohibit weight discrimination can be found in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Iceland, especially for laws to remedy this discrimination in employment. Our findings provide important information for policymakers and interest groups both nationally and internationally and can help guide discussions about policy priorities to reduce inequities resulting from weight discrimination.","PeriodicalId":78777,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","volume":"10 1","pages":"691-731"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

Abstract

CONTEXT People viewed as "overweight" or "obese" are vulnerable to weight-based discrimination, creating inequities and adverse health outcomes. Given the high rates of obesity recorded globally, studies documenting weight discrimination in multiple countries, and an absence of legislation to address this form of discrimination, research examining policy remedies across different countries is needed. Our study provides the first multinational examination of public support for policies and legislation to prohibit weight discrimination. METHODS Identical online surveys were completed by 2,866 adults in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Iceland. We assessed public support for potential laws to prohibit weight-based discrimination, such as adding body weight to existing civil rights statutes, extending disability protections to persons with obesity, and instituting legal measures to prohibit employers from discriminating against employees because of body weight. We examined sociodemographic and weight-related characteristics predicting support for antidiscrimination policies, and the differences in these patterns across countries. FINDINGS The majority of participants in the United States, Canada, and Australia agreed that their government should have specific laws in place to prohibit weight discrimination. At least two-thirds of the participants in all 4 countries expressed support for policies that would make it illegal for employers to refuse to hire, assign lower wages, deny promotions, or terminate qualified employees because of body weight. Women and participants with higher body weight expressed more support for antidiscrimination measures. Beliefs about the causes of obesity were also related to support for these laws. CONCLUSIONS Public support for legal measures to prohibit weight discrimination can be found in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Iceland, especially for laws to remedy this discrimination in employment. Our findings provide important information for policymakers and interest groups both nationally and internationally and can help guide discussions about policy priorities to reduce inequities resulting from weight discrimination.
禁止体重歧视的潜在政策和法律:来自4个国家的公众意见。
被视为“超重”或“肥胖”的人很容易受到基于体重的歧视,造成不公平和不利的健康后果。鉴于全球范围内的高肥胖率,研究记录了多个国家的体重歧视,以及缺乏解决这种形式的歧视的立法,需要研究不同国家的政策补救措施。我们的研究首次对公众支持禁止体重歧视的政策和立法进行了跨国调查。方法对美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和冰岛的2866名成年人进行了相同的在线调查。我们评估了公众对禁止基于体重的歧视的潜在法律的支持程度,例如在现有的民权法规中增加体重,将残疾保护扩大到肥胖人群,以及制定法律措施禁止雇主因体重歧视雇员。我们研究了预测反歧视政策支持度的社会人口学和体重相关特征,以及这些模式在各国之间的差异。调查结果:美国、加拿大和澳大利亚的大多数参与者都认为,他们的政府应该制定专门的法律来禁止体重歧视。在所有四个国家中,至少有三分之二的参与者表示支持将雇主因体重问题拒绝雇用、降低工资、拒绝晋升或解雇合格员工的政策定为非法。女性和体重较高的参与者更支持反歧视措施。对肥胖原因的看法也与对这些法律的支持有关。结论在美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和冰岛,公众支持采取法律措施禁止体重歧视,尤其支持通过法律来纠正就业中的这种歧视。我们的研究结果为国内和国际的政策制定者和利益集团提供了重要信息,并有助于指导关于减少体重歧视导致的不平等的政策优先事项的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信