Comparison among Three Chisel Plough Shares Forms

M. Abo-habaga
{"title":"Comparison among Three Chisel Plough Shares Forms","authors":"M. Abo-habaga","doi":"10.21608/jssae.2022.127101.1065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison among three chisels plough shares forms i.e., shovel with a width of 10 cm, breaker sweep with a width of 15 cm and wing with a width of 20 cm was executed with soil having a silt loam texture under constant operating circumstances. The main results of the current study can be summarized as follows; The soil surface after ploughing with shovel shares form possessed the greatest percentage of the roughness (59.03%), whereas utilization of the breaker sweep and wing shares form leaved the soil surface with roughness of 51.9 and 37.9%, respectively. The percentage ploughed area after ploughing at depth of 18 cm was 55.37%, 64.2695 and 75% from the total area with usage of shovel, breaker sweep and wing shares forms, respectively. The power required for ploughing process at an operating depth of 18 cm and forward speed of 0.8 m Sec -1 were 7.92, 11.76 and 9.3 kW, while the unit draught of soil was 0.62, 0.8 and 0.54 kN cm -2 concerning the shovel shares form, breaker sweep shares and wing shares form, respectively. Generally, it can be concluded that the chisel plough with wing shares form is the most suitable primary tillage implement.","PeriodicalId":17094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2022.127101.1065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparison among three chisels plough shares forms i.e., shovel with a width of 10 cm, breaker sweep with a width of 15 cm and wing with a width of 20 cm was executed with soil having a silt loam texture under constant operating circumstances. The main results of the current study can be summarized as follows; The soil surface after ploughing with shovel shares form possessed the greatest percentage of the roughness (59.03%), whereas utilization of the breaker sweep and wing shares form leaved the soil surface with roughness of 51.9 and 37.9%, respectively. The percentage ploughed area after ploughing at depth of 18 cm was 55.37%, 64.2695 and 75% from the total area with usage of shovel, breaker sweep and wing shares forms, respectively. The power required for ploughing process at an operating depth of 18 cm and forward speed of 0.8 m Sec -1 were 7.92, 11.76 and 9.3 kW, while the unit draught of soil was 0.62, 0.8 and 0.54 kN cm -2 concerning the shovel shares form, breaker sweep shares and wing shares form, respectively. Generally, it can be concluded that the chisel plough with wing shares form is the most suitable primary tillage implement.
三种凿子犁股形式的比较
在恒定工作条件下,对三种凿子犁头形式,即宽度为10厘米的铲、宽度为15厘米的破碎机铲和宽度为20厘米的耙进行了比较,并对淤泥壤土质地的土壤进行了比较。本研究的主要结果可以总结如下:铲铲铲耕后土壤表面粗糙度最大(59.03%),铲铲铲耕后土壤表面粗糙度为51.9%,铲铲铲耕后土壤表面粗糙度为37.9%。采用铲式、铲式、翼式三种耕作方式,在18 cm深度耕作后的耕地面积占总面积的比例分别为55.37%、64.2695和75%。耕深为18 cm、前进速度为0.8 m Sec -1时所需功率分别为7.92、11.76和9.3 kW,铲股形式、破碎机扫股形式和翼股形式的单位土壤风量分别为0.62、0.8和0.54 kN cm -2。综上所述,翼股型凿犁是最适宜的初级耕作工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信