Resistance and Swellability of Stabilized Samples of Marl Problematic Soils Using Nano-silica and Nano-alumina

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
R. Alipour, Heshmati R. Ali Akbar, Jafar Karimiazar, Narges Isazadehfar, E. Asghari-Kaljahi, S. H. Bahmani
{"title":"Resistance and Swellability of Stabilized Samples of Marl Problematic Soils Using Nano-silica and Nano-alumina","authors":"R. Alipour, Heshmati R. Ali Akbar, Jafar Karimiazar, Narges Isazadehfar, E. Asghari-Kaljahi, S. H. Bahmani","doi":"10.1680/jgeen.21.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the effects of Nano-silica and Nano-alumina on the Marl soil as a problematic soil in Tabriz, Iran. These soils, which are among the swellable soils, constitute the foundation of most projects in Tabriz. Due to water absorption, these soils are liable to volume change and instability risks in the foundation of projects. Consequently, various physical and chemical methods have been employed to stabilize these soils. In the present study, for the first time, the reconstructed samples of Tabriz Marl were stabilized with various percentages of Nano-silica and Nano-alumina, which have fewer environmental effects in comparison with ordinary additives such as Portland cement or lime. In addition, soil swelling behaviors have been evaluated by various experiments including Atterberg limits, density, free swelling, swelling pressure, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests, direct shear tests, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analyses which were conducted at 1, 7, and 28 days of curing times. The results show that Nano-alumina has a greater effect on reducing the swelling of stabilized samples than Nano-silica. However, the effect of Nano-silica has been more than Nano-alumina on increasing the strength CBR.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.21.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of Nano-silica and Nano-alumina on the Marl soil as a problematic soil in Tabriz, Iran. These soils, which are among the swellable soils, constitute the foundation of most projects in Tabriz. Due to water absorption, these soils are liable to volume change and instability risks in the foundation of projects. Consequently, various physical and chemical methods have been employed to stabilize these soils. In the present study, for the first time, the reconstructed samples of Tabriz Marl were stabilized with various percentages of Nano-silica and Nano-alumina, which have fewer environmental effects in comparison with ordinary additives such as Portland cement or lime. In addition, soil swelling behaviors have been evaluated by various experiments including Atterberg limits, density, free swelling, swelling pressure, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests, direct shear tests, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analyses which were conducted at 1, 7, and 28 days of curing times. The results show that Nano-alumina has a greater effect on reducing the swelling of stabilized samples than Nano-silica. However, the effect of Nano-silica has been more than Nano-alumina on increasing the strength CBR.
用纳米二氧化硅和纳米氧化铝稳定泥灰岩问题土样品的阻力和膨胀性
本研究调查了纳米二氧化硅和纳米氧化铝对伊朗大不里士灰泥土的影响。这些土壤属于可膨胀土壤,构成了大不里士大多数项目的基础。由于吸水,这些土壤在工程基础中容易发生体积变化和失稳风险。因此,人们采用了各种物理和化学方法来稳定这些土壤。在本研究中,首次使用不同百分比的纳米二氧化硅和纳米氧化铝来稳定大不里士泥的重建样品,与普通添加剂(如波特兰水泥或石灰)相比,纳米二氧化硅和纳米氧化铝对环境的影响更小。此外,通过各种实验,包括阿特伯格极限、密度、自由膨胀、膨胀压力、加州承载比(CBR)试验、直接剪切试验、场发射扫描电镜(FESEM)和x射线粉末衍射(XRD)分析,对土的膨胀行为进行了评估,这些实验分别在固化1、7和28天进行。结果表明,纳米氧化铝比纳米二氧化硅对稳定样品的溶胀有更大的抑制作用。然而,纳米二氧化硅在提高CBR强度方面的作用大于纳米氧化铝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信