The authors reply: Impact of metabolic syndrome on response to medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

A. Kabir, A. Cyrus
{"title":"The authors reply: Impact of metabolic syndrome on response to medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia","authors":"A. Kabir, A. Cyrus","doi":"10.4111/kju.2015.56.12.847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the editor: \n \nWe express our special thanks for these nice comments on our published paper in your journal [1]. Our study was done before the release of the mentioned new guidelines in 2015 [2]. Moreover, there are studies that have also studied different outcomes (effect) of different durations of these medications on benign prostatic hyperplasia [3,4,5]. We were not able to study the maximal effect for more than 3 months. Because of the lack of previous studies with our design, we preferred to run a study with a shorter duration. In addition, our study was a cohort based on the present data and not a clinical trial with an arbitrary duration of study. \n \nOur treatment regimen contained both medications and we did not have a cohort of persons receiving only one of these medications. Perhaps in a factorial clinical trial with different groups consisting of only one of these medications, their combination and placebo could be useful for evaluation of the effect of each regimen. Surely, our results cannot be assumed to refer to only one of these medications but to their combination. \n \nIn response to the comment, \"In addition, the clinical effects of 5ARIs are seen after a minimum treatment duration of at least 6 to 12 months,\" we should note that in our study, the effects of combination therapy had been observed with a shorter duration. It may be that combination therapy is more effective with a shorter duration and that the effect of combination therapy with both finasteride and prazosin is different from their single treatment effect. \n \nFinally, our study was a clinical study and not a basic evaluation of the hormones. Accordingly, we prefer to not discuss these issues, even though the authors' opinions about hormonal pathways and changes seem logical. We think that these issues need a separate study evaluating the effect of all single or combination therapies on biochemical, hormonal, and enzymatic changes.","PeriodicalId":17819,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Urology","volume":"20 1","pages":"847 - 848"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.12.847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To the editor: We express our special thanks for these nice comments on our published paper in your journal [1]. Our study was done before the release of the mentioned new guidelines in 2015 [2]. Moreover, there are studies that have also studied different outcomes (effect) of different durations of these medications on benign prostatic hyperplasia [3,4,5]. We were not able to study the maximal effect for more than 3 months. Because of the lack of previous studies with our design, we preferred to run a study with a shorter duration. In addition, our study was a cohort based on the present data and not a clinical trial with an arbitrary duration of study. Our treatment regimen contained both medications and we did not have a cohort of persons receiving only one of these medications. Perhaps in a factorial clinical trial with different groups consisting of only one of these medications, their combination and placebo could be useful for evaluation of the effect of each regimen. Surely, our results cannot be assumed to refer to only one of these medications but to their combination. In response to the comment, "In addition, the clinical effects of 5ARIs are seen after a minimum treatment duration of at least 6 to 12 months," we should note that in our study, the effects of combination therapy had been observed with a shorter duration. It may be that combination therapy is more effective with a shorter duration and that the effect of combination therapy with both finasteride and prazosin is different from their single treatment effect. Finally, our study was a clinical study and not a basic evaluation of the hormones. Accordingly, we prefer to not discuss these issues, even though the authors' opinions about hormonal pathways and changes seem logical. We think that these issues need a separate study evaluating the effect of all single or combination therapies on biochemical, hormonal, and enzymatic changes.
作者回复:代谢综合征对良性前列腺增生药物治疗反应的影响
致编辑:我们特别感谢您在您的期刊上对我们发表的论文的好评[1]。我们的研究是在2015年上述新指南发布之前完成的[2]。此外,也有研究研究了这些药物不同用药时间对前列腺增生的不同结局(效果)[3,4,5]。我们无法研究超过3个月的最大效果。由于缺乏与我们设计相关的既往研究,我们倾向于进行一项持续时间较短的研究。此外,我们的研究是基于现有数据的队列研究,而不是具有任意研究时间的临床试验。我们的治疗方案包含这两种药物,我们没有只接受其中一种药物的人群。也许在仅由这些药物中的一种组成的不同组的析因临床试验中,它们的组合和安慰剂可以用于评估每种方案的效果。当然,我们的研究结果不能只适用于其中一种药物,而是它们的组合。针对“另外,5ARIs的临床效果需要至少6 - 12个月的最短治疗时间才能看到”的评论,我们应该注意到,在我们的研究中,联合治疗的效果是在更短的时间内观察到的。可能是联合治疗更有效,持续时间更短,非那雄胺和普唑嗪联合治疗的效果不同于它们单独治疗的效果。最后,我们的研究是临床研究,而不是对激素的基本评估。因此,我们宁愿不讨论这些问题,即使作者关于激素途径和变化的观点似乎合乎逻辑。我们认为这些问题需要一项单独的研究来评估所有单一或联合治疗对生化、激素和酶变化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信