Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer to Carious Primary Dentin After Treatment with SDF and SDF/KI

M. Mohan, Caitlin Chidsey, R. Rosivack
{"title":"Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer to Carious Primary Dentin After Treatment with SDF and SDF/KI","authors":"M. Mohan, Caitlin Chidsey, R. Rosivack","doi":"10.22038/JDMT.2020.49843.1380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer to carious dentin in primary molars that were treated with silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to that of primary molars treated with silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide (SDF/KI). Methods: Thirty-nine extracted carious primary molar samples were prepared and divided into two groups. Twenty samples received two applications of SDF and 19 samples received two applications of SDF/KI.  All samples were restored with glass ionomer (EQUIA Forte). The samples were tested using a vertical displacement test to evaluate the microtensile bond strength. Results: The microtensile bond strength of the glass ionomer to carious dentin was greater in the teeth treated with SDF/KI than in the teeth treated with SDF alone. The results were statistically significant with a p-value Conclusions: Pretreatment of carious dentin with silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide resulted in a greater microtensile bond strength to a glass ionomer when compared to carious dentin treated with silver diamine fluoride alone.","PeriodicalId":15640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","volume":"5 1","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JDMT.2020.49843.1380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction:The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer to carious dentin in primary molars that were treated with silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to that of primary molars treated with silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide (SDF/KI). Methods: Thirty-nine extracted carious primary molar samples were prepared and divided into two groups. Twenty samples received two applications of SDF and 19 samples received two applications of SDF/KI.  All samples were restored with glass ionomer (EQUIA Forte). The samples were tested using a vertical displacement test to evaluate the microtensile bond strength. Results: The microtensile bond strength of the glass ionomer to carious dentin was greater in the teeth treated with SDF/KI than in the teeth treated with SDF alone. The results were statistically significant with a p-value Conclusions: Pretreatment of carious dentin with silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide resulted in a greater microtensile bond strength to a glass ionomer when compared to carious dentin treated with silver diamine fluoride alone.
SDF与SDF/KI治疗牙本质后玻璃离聚体与牙本质微拉伸结合强度的比较
前言:本实验旨在比较氟化二胺银(SDF)与氟化二胺银和碘化钾(SDF/KI)处理的乳牙中玻璃离聚体与龋齿牙本质的微拉伸结合强度。方法:制备龋牙一磨牙标本39份,分为两组。20个样本使用了两次SDF, 19个样本使用了两次SDF/KI。所有样品均用玻璃离子(EQUIA Forte)修复。使用垂直位移试验对样品进行测试,以评估微拉伸粘结强度。结果:SDF/KI处理后的牙本质与玻璃离子的微拉伸结合强度明显高于单独使用SDF处理的牙本质。结论:与单独用氟化二胺银处理牙本质相比,用氟化二胺银和碘化钾预处理牙本质与玻璃离子的微拉伸结合强度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信