International Investment Positions, Gross Capital Flows, and Global Liquidity

T. Iwamoto
{"title":"International Investment Positions, Gross Capital Flows, and Global Liquidity","authors":"T. Iwamoto","doi":"10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY.IE2015.01.TI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To begin with, we analyzed the contrasting structure of the US and Japan’s international investment positions (IIPs) and their asymmetric movements of “valuation effects” derived from different IIP structures (exorbitant privilege and duty) before and after the global financial crisis (GFC). Then, we realized that a signifi cant impact on the GFC was not current account imbalances, which are equal to the net capital flows from Asian surplus countries to the US as a deficit country (global saving glut), but the gross capital flows between the US and Europe, both of which run current account deficits. Finally, we investigated the idea that the gross capital flows from the US to Europe represented the raising of wholesale funding through the US money market funds (MMFs) by European banks’ US branches and subsid iaries and then shipping it to their headquarters. From the viewpoint of the banking sector, these gross capital flows are in a large part regarded as global liquidity, espe cially non - core liabilities supplied by the US shadow banking system.","PeriodicalId":22492,"journal":{"name":"The International economy","volume":"67 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY.IE2015.01.TI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To begin with, we analyzed the contrasting structure of the US and Japan’s international investment positions (IIPs) and their asymmetric movements of “valuation effects” derived from different IIP structures (exorbitant privilege and duty) before and after the global financial crisis (GFC). Then, we realized that a signifi cant impact on the GFC was not current account imbalances, which are equal to the net capital flows from Asian surplus countries to the US as a deficit country (global saving glut), but the gross capital flows between the US and Europe, both of which run current account deficits. Finally, we investigated the idea that the gross capital flows from the US to Europe represented the raising of wholesale funding through the US money market funds (MMFs) by European banks’ US branches and subsid iaries and then shipping it to their headquarters. From the viewpoint of the banking sector, these gross capital flows are in a large part regarded as global liquidity, espe cially non - core liabilities supplied by the US shadow banking system.
国际投资头寸,总资本流动和全球流动性
首先,我们分析了美国和日本在全球金融危机(GFC)前后国际投资头寸(IIP)结构的差异,以及不同IIP结构(过高的特权和义务)导致的“估值效应”的不对称运动。然后,我们意识到,对全球金融危机产生重大影响的不是经常账户失衡,而是美国和欧洲之间的总资本流动,这两个国家都存在经常账户赤字。经常账户失衡等于亚洲盈余国家向作为赤字国家的美国的净资本流动(全球储蓄过剩)。最后,我们调查了这样一种观点,即从美国流向欧洲的总资本流,代表了欧洲银行在美国的分支机构和子公司通过美国货币市场基金(mmf)筹集批发资金,然后将其运往总部。从银行业的角度来看,这些资本流动总额在很大程度上被视为全球流动性,尤其是美国影子银行体系提供的非核心负债。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信