Profiling the Australasian paramedicine tertiary academic sector and workforce: A cross-sectional study

Q2 Health Professions
Paul Simpson, N. Barr, David Reid, M. Boyle, B. Williams
{"title":"Profiling the Australasian paramedicine tertiary academic sector and workforce: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Paul Simpson, N. Barr, David Reid, M. Boyle, B. Williams","doi":"10.1177/27536386231185602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction In 1994, the first Australasian paramedicine tertiary program commenced as an off-campus offering not required as an entry-to-practice qualification A quarter of a century later, university programs have proliferated with tertiary qualifications becoming mandatory to acquire Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency registration. Despite this progression, concerns have been voiced regarding student enrolment volume and sustainability of the paramedicine academic workforce. To date, a census of the sector and the workforce has not been conducted, limiting capacity for data-informed strategic planning. The aim of this study was to profile the Australasian paramedicine tertiary sector and describe the academic workforce working in it. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2022 using an online survey designed specifically for this research. The participants were discipline leaders from 19 universities or polytechnics offering entry-to-practice courses in Australia and New Zealand. Participants were asked to provide data on their course structure, organisational position, student enrolment loads and academic and non-academic staffing profiles. Simple descriptive statistics were generated to describe these data. Results Of the 19 eligible programs, 18 participated (response rate 90%). All but one course was at the undergraduate level; of the undergraduate courses, all but one were 3 years in duration. The academic workforce comprised 161 full-time or fractional and 727 casual paramedicine academics. Of the full-time academics, 131/161 were registered, with 45% of those holding ‘non-practicing’ status. Twenty-nine paramedicine academics (18%) had PhDs. There was 1 Professor and 10 Associate Professors, whilst 65% overall were Lecturers or Associate Lecturers. Conclusion This analysis represents the first description of the Australasian paramedicine tertiary sector. It reveals a diverse sector with large student enrolments and diverse course structures. The seniority of the academic workforce is skewed substantially towards lower academic levels; this shortfall in senior academics creates risk for the sector and may be symptomatic of a workforce sustainability issue.","PeriodicalId":55865,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"206 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231185602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction In 1994, the first Australasian paramedicine tertiary program commenced as an off-campus offering not required as an entry-to-practice qualification A quarter of a century later, university programs have proliferated with tertiary qualifications becoming mandatory to acquire Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency registration. Despite this progression, concerns have been voiced regarding student enrolment volume and sustainability of the paramedicine academic workforce. To date, a census of the sector and the workforce has not been conducted, limiting capacity for data-informed strategic planning. The aim of this study was to profile the Australasian paramedicine tertiary sector and describe the academic workforce working in it. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2022 using an online survey designed specifically for this research. The participants were discipline leaders from 19 universities or polytechnics offering entry-to-practice courses in Australia and New Zealand. Participants were asked to provide data on their course structure, organisational position, student enrolment loads and academic and non-academic staffing profiles. Simple descriptive statistics were generated to describe these data. Results Of the 19 eligible programs, 18 participated (response rate 90%). All but one course was at the undergraduate level; of the undergraduate courses, all but one were 3 years in duration. The academic workforce comprised 161 full-time or fractional and 727 casual paramedicine academics. Of the full-time academics, 131/161 were registered, with 45% of those holding ‘non-practicing’ status. Twenty-nine paramedicine academics (18%) had PhDs. There was 1 Professor and 10 Associate Professors, whilst 65% overall were Lecturers or Associate Lecturers. Conclusion This analysis represents the first description of the Australasian paramedicine tertiary sector. It reveals a diverse sector with large student enrolments and diverse course structures. The seniority of the academic workforce is skewed substantially towards lower academic levels; this shortfall in senior academics creates risk for the sector and may be symptomatic of a workforce sustainability issue.
概述澳大利亚三级医疗辅助学术部门和劳动力:横断面研究
1994年,澳大利亚第一个辅助医学高等教育课程作为校外课程开始,不需要作为进入执业资格。四分之一个世纪后,大学课程激增,高等教育资格成为获得澳大利亚卫生从业人员监管机构注册的强制性要求。尽管取得了这一进展,但人们对学生入学人数和辅助医学学术队伍的可持续性表示担忧。迄今为止,尚未对该部门和劳动力进行普查,限制了根据数据进行战略规划的能力。本研究的目的是概述澳大利亚的辅助医学第三部门,并描述在其中工作的学术劳动力。方法采用专为本研究设计的在线调查,于2022年5月进行横断面研究。参与者是来自澳大利亚和新西兰19所提供实习入门课程的大学或理工学院的学科负责人。参与者被要求提供有关他们的课程结构、组织位置、学生入学负荷以及学术和非学术人员概况的数据。生成了简单的描述性统计来描述这些数据。结果在19个符合条件的项目中,有18个项目参与其中(回复率90%)。除了一门课程外,其他课程都是本科水平的;本科课程中,除一门课程外,其余均为三年。学术人员包括161名全职或兼职医学专家和727名兼职医学专家。在全职学者中,161人中有131人注册,其中45%的人持有“非执业”身份。29名医学辅助学者(18%)拥有博士学位。其中教授1人,副教授10人,讲师或副讲师占65%。结论本分析首次描述了澳大拉西亚的辅助医疗第三产业。它揭示了一个多样化的部门,有大量的学生入学和多样化的课程结构。学术人员的资历严重偏向较低的学术水平;资深学者的短缺给该行业带来了风险,可能是劳动力可持续性问题的征兆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Paramedicine
Australasian Journal of Paramedicine Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信