The Combination of Sufentanil and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Changes During Anesthetic Induction and Endotracheal Intubation

Kang Mia, Cobb Kathryn
{"title":"The Combination of Sufentanil and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Changes During Anesthetic Induction and Endotracheal Intubation","authors":"Kang Mia, Cobb Kathryn","doi":"10.36959/377/369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In presenting their results comparing the use of sufentanil alone (Group S) versus sufentanil with the addition of remifentanil (Group R) we would like to point out a significant source of potential bias in their study design and reporting of results. Specifically, the authors note that in their protocol atropine was administered in the event of bradycardia and dopamine was administered for hypotension. They present the data comparing the hemodynamic parameters using the two protocols but do not present any data regarding administration of these vaso active agents. This seems like an important omission when presenting data on hemodynamic stability during induction since this would be a significant confounder. Examining the administration of atropine and Letter to the Editor","PeriodicalId":92399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and pain management","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/377/369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In presenting their results comparing the use of sufentanil alone (Group S) versus sufentanil with the addition of remifentanil (Group R) we would like to point out a significant source of potential bias in their study design and reporting of results. Specifically, the authors note that in their protocol atropine was administered in the event of bradycardia and dopamine was administered for hypotension. They present the data comparing the hemodynamic parameters using the two protocols but do not present any data regarding administration of these vaso active agents. This seems like an important omission when presenting data on hemodynamic stability during induction since this would be a significant confounder. Examining the administration of atropine and Letter to the Editor
舒芬太尼与瑞芬太尼联用对麻醉诱导及气管插管血流动力学的影响
在比较单独使用舒芬太尼(S组)和舒芬太尼加用瑞芬太尼(R组)的结果时,我们想指出他们的研究设计和结果报告中潜在偏差的一个重要来源。具体来说,作者指出,在他们的方案中,阿托品用于心动过缓,多巴胺用于低血压。他们提供了使用两种方案比较血流动力学参数的数据,但没有提供有关这些血管活性药物施用的任何数据。这似乎是一个重要的遗漏,当提出的数据在诱导期间的血流动力学稳定性,因为这将是一个重要的混淆。检查阿托品的管理和给编辑的信
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信