Comparison of the removal efficiency of endocrine disrupting compounds between two lab-scale treatment processes

Qi Zhang, Bingling Wang, Kebo Wang, Renzheng Zhao, S. Ao, G. Zhu, Xinru Wang, O. Shen
{"title":"Comparison of the removal efficiency of endocrine disrupting compounds between two lab-scale treatment processes","authors":"Qi Zhang, Bingling Wang, Kebo Wang, Renzheng Zhao, S. Ao, G. Zhu, Xinru Wang, O. Shen","doi":"10.1109/RSETE.2011.5966096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some newly identified contaminants in our water resources have been recognized as endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). It has become a threat to our drinking water. The existing conventional water treatment plants were not designed for these contaminants. The removal efficiency of EDCs from the source water samples using lab-scale water treatment processes, biological contact oxidation (BCO) process and activated carbon (AC), was estimated and compared. The types and concentrations of EDCs and androgenic activities were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and reporter gene assay respectively before and after treatment. The EDCs concentrations were decreased sharply for both methods. But the antiandrogenic activities showed no significant difference between before and after BCO treatment. In conclusion, the EDCs removal efficiency of AC, especially the granular form, might more effective than BCO process.","PeriodicalId":6296,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RSETE.2011.5966096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some newly identified contaminants in our water resources have been recognized as endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). It has become a threat to our drinking water. The existing conventional water treatment plants were not designed for these contaminants. The removal efficiency of EDCs from the source water samples using lab-scale water treatment processes, biological contact oxidation (BCO) process and activated carbon (AC), was estimated and compared. The types and concentrations of EDCs and androgenic activities were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and reporter gene assay respectively before and after treatment. The EDCs concentrations were decreased sharply for both methods. But the antiandrogenic activities showed no significant difference between before and after BCO treatment. In conclusion, the EDCs removal efficiency of AC, especially the granular form, might more effective than BCO process.
两种实验室规模处理工艺对内分泌干扰物去除率的比较
水资源中一些新发现的污染物已被确认为内分泌干扰物(EDCs)。它已经对我们的饮用水造成了威胁。现有的传统水处理厂不是为这些污染物而设计的。比较了生物接触氧化法(BCO)和活性炭法(AC)对源水样中EDCs的去除效果。采用气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)和报告基因法分析治疗前后EDCs的类型、浓度和雄激素活性。两种方法的EDCs浓度均显著降低。而BCO治疗前后抗雄激素活性差异无统计学意义。综上所述,活性炭对EDCs的去除效率,尤其是颗粒形式的EDCs,可能比BCO工艺更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信