Home pregnancy tests in the hands of the intended user

Jackie Boxer, Sarah Weddell, David Broomhead, C. Hogg, Sarah Johnson
{"title":"Home pregnancy tests in the hands of the intended user","authors":"Jackie Boxer, Sarah Weddell, David Broomhead, C. Hogg, Sarah Johnson","doi":"10.1080/15321819.2019.1671861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were to investigate the usability and performance of seven visual home pregnancy tests, available in Europe. Part one of the study was home-based and involved volunteers testing a selection of four home pregnancy tests. The tests used and order of use were randomized. Part two, performed at a study site, involved volunteers reading and interpreting the results of the same selection of home pregnancy tests used in part one, but using urine standards representing early pregnancy (25 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) or a ‘not pregnant’ (0 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) sample. The volunteers completed a questionnaire after each test in both parts. Three of the seven tests met their accuracy/reliability claims: tests A (99.8%), B (100%), and F (97.6%) (not statistically different from the claimed 99% accuracy). The remaining four tests had accuracies/reliabilities of <99% at 81.6% (C), 89.0% (E), 92.5% (D), and 95.9% (G), respectively. Test A was the highest-rated test for each attribute tested in both settings. Test D was ranked the lowest in part one and test C was ranked lowest overall for part two. Home pregnancy tests vary in performance and usability, therefore requiring better standardization and performance evaluation in Europe. Clinical Trials Reference Number: NCT03589534","PeriodicalId":15987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry","volume":"6 1","pages":"642 - 652"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15321819.2019.1671861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were to investigate the usability and performance of seven visual home pregnancy tests, available in Europe. Part one of the study was home-based and involved volunteers testing a selection of four home pregnancy tests. The tests used and order of use were randomized. Part two, performed at a study site, involved volunteers reading and interpreting the results of the same selection of home pregnancy tests used in part one, but using urine standards representing early pregnancy (25 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) or a ‘not pregnant’ (0 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) sample. The volunteers completed a questionnaire after each test in both parts. Three of the seven tests met their accuracy/reliability claims: tests A (99.8%), B (100%), and F (97.6%) (not statistically different from the claimed 99% accuracy). The remaining four tests had accuracies/reliabilities of <99% at 81.6% (C), 89.0% (E), 92.5% (D), and 95.9% (G), respectively. Test A was the highest-rated test for each attribute tested in both settings. Test D was ranked the lowest in part one and test C was ranked lowest overall for part two. Home pregnancy tests vary in performance and usability, therefore requiring better standardization and performance evaluation in Europe. Clinical Trials Reference Number: NCT03589534
家庭验孕棒在目标用户手中
摘要:本研究的目的是调查欧洲七种视觉家用妊娠试验的可用性和性能。研究的第一部分以家庭为基础,志愿者们选择四种家庭验孕棒进行测试。使用的试验和使用顺序是随机的。第二部分在研究现场进行,志愿者阅读和解释与第一部分相同的家庭妊娠试验选择的结果,但使用代表早期妊娠的尿液标准(25 mIU/mL人绒毛膜促性腺激素)或“未怀孕”(0 mIU/mL人绒毛膜促性腺激素)样本。志愿者们在两个部分的每次测试后都要完成一份问卷。七个测试中有三个符合其准确性/可靠性声明:测试A (99.8%), B(100%)和F(97.6%)(与声称的99%准确性没有统计学差异)。其余4项检验的准确性/信度分别为81.6% (C)、89.0% (E)、92.5% (D)和95.9% (G),均<99%。测试A是在两种设置中测试的每个属性的最高评级测试。测试D在第一部分中排名最低,测试C在第二部分中排名最低。家庭验孕试纸的性能和可用性各不相同,因此在欧洲需要更好的标准化和性能评估。临床试验参考号:NCT03589534
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信