Informed consent in dentistry and medicine in Spain: Practical considerations and legality

María Otero, N. Oishi, F. Martínez, M. T. Ballester, J. Basterra
{"title":"Informed consent in dentistry and medicine in Spain: Practical considerations and legality","authors":"María Otero, N. Oishi, F. Martínez, M. T. Ballester, J. Basterra","doi":"10.4317/medoral.25265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The healthcare practice of dentistry, as well as medicine, is framed within a legal environment. Patients have the right to know all the information related to any action performed on them and dental or medical doctors are obliged to obtain their patient’s prior written informed consent (IC) before undertaking any healthcare procedures. Material and Methods Here we reviewed the legality and jurisprudence in Spain regarding IC. We also used INFLESZ text readability analysis software to analyse a sample of official Spanish informed consent documents (ICDs) from different surgical and interventional procedures related to dentistry and oral cavity interventions. Results It is a mistake to confound IC with ICDs. This error prevents physicians from considering the former as a care process in which the patient’s authorisation signature is the last link in a chain formed, almost in its entirety, by the informative process and deliberation alongside the patient. Multiple factors can influence communication between practitioners and their patients. Importantly, treatment adherence is greater when patients feel involved and autonomous in shared decision-making and when the circumstances of their lives are adequately considered. We concluded that although the ICDs we analysed conformed to the requirements set out in international law, they were somewhat difficult to read according to the reading habits of the general Spanish population. Conclusions Knowledge about the legality of IC helps professionals to understand the problems that may arise from their non-compliance. This is because the omission or defective fulfilment of IC obligations is the origin of legal responsibility for medical practitioners. In this sense, to date, there have been more convictions for defective ICs than for malpractice. The information provided in ICs should include the risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives and must be tailored to the needs and capabilities of the patient to enable autonomous decision-making. Key words:Informed consent, legality of informed consent, principle of autonomy, defensive medicine, satisfactive medicine, health law, stomatology, oral surgery, dentistry.","PeriodicalId":18367,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","volume":"38 2","pages":"e294 - e300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The healthcare practice of dentistry, as well as medicine, is framed within a legal environment. Patients have the right to know all the information related to any action performed on them and dental or medical doctors are obliged to obtain their patient’s prior written informed consent (IC) before undertaking any healthcare procedures. Material and Methods Here we reviewed the legality and jurisprudence in Spain regarding IC. We also used INFLESZ text readability analysis software to analyse a sample of official Spanish informed consent documents (ICDs) from different surgical and interventional procedures related to dentistry and oral cavity interventions. Results It is a mistake to confound IC with ICDs. This error prevents physicians from considering the former as a care process in which the patient’s authorisation signature is the last link in a chain formed, almost in its entirety, by the informative process and deliberation alongside the patient. Multiple factors can influence communication between practitioners and their patients. Importantly, treatment adherence is greater when patients feel involved and autonomous in shared decision-making and when the circumstances of their lives are adequately considered. We concluded that although the ICDs we analysed conformed to the requirements set out in international law, they were somewhat difficult to read according to the reading habits of the general Spanish population. Conclusions Knowledge about the legality of IC helps professionals to understand the problems that may arise from their non-compliance. This is because the omission or defective fulfilment of IC obligations is the origin of legal responsibility for medical practitioners. In this sense, to date, there have been more convictions for defective ICs than for malpractice. The information provided in ICs should include the risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives and must be tailored to the needs and capabilities of the patient to enable autonomous decision-making. Key words:Informed consent, legality of informed consent, principle of autonomy, defensive medicine, satisfactive medicine, health law, stomatology, oral surgery, dentistry.
西班牙牙科和医学的知情同意:实际考虑和合法性
背景牙科保健实践,以及医学,是在法律环境框架内。患者有权知道与对其采取的任何行动有关的所有信息,牙医或医生有义务在采取任何保健程序之前事先获得患者的书面知情同意。材料和方法在此,我们回顾了西班牙关于IC的合法性和法理。我们还使用INFLESZ文本可读性分析软件分析了西班牙官方知情同意文件(icd)样本,这些文件来自与牙科和口腔干预相关的不同外科和介入程序。结果混淆IC与ICDs是错误的。这一错误阻止了医生将前者视为一个护理过程,在这个过程中,患者的授权签名是由患者的信息过程和审议形成的链中的最后一个环节,几乎是完整的。多种因素会影响医生和病人之间的沟通。重要的是,当患者在共同决策中感到参与和自主时,当他们的生活环境得到充分考虑时,治疗依从性更强。我们的结论是,虽然我们分析的icd符合国际法规定的要求,但根据西班牙一般人口的阅读习惯,它们的阅读有些困难。结论:了解IC的合法性有助于专业人员了解由于他们的不合规而可能产生的问题。这是因为不履行或有缺陷地履行医疗保险义务是医疗从业人员法律责任的根源。从这个意义上说,到目前为止,有缺陷的智能身份证被定罪的数量要多于渎职。ic中提供的信息应包括风险、益处和治疗方案,并且必须根据患者的需求和能力进行调整,以实现自主决策。关键词:知情同意,知情同意的合法性,自主原则,防御性医学,满意医学,卫生法,口腔科,口腔外科,牙科
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信