Re-membering Cherokee Justice in Ruth Muskrat Bronson’s “The Serpent”

Alexander Cavanaugh
{"title":"Re-membering Cherokee Justice in Ruth Muskrat Bronson’s “The Serpent”","authors":"Alexander Cavanaugh","doi":"10.5250/amerindiquar.44.1.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article offers a reading of the little-known 1925 short story “The Serpent” by Cherokee writer and political figure Ruth Muskrat Bronson. Published in the Mount Holyoke Monthly, “The Serpent” challenges federal policy during the allotment era, particularly the unparalleled power of Indian agents as key political figures during and after Oklahoma statehood. Bronson represents the threat of sexual violence during this time, forecasting the jurisdictional crisis that Native communities would continue to face up to the present. In response to these dangers to the Cherokee Nation and its citizens, Bronson’s story re-members Cherokee matrilineal and clan legal systems as her protagonist intervenes in the predatory advances of the Indian agent. The story, I argue, marks a turning point in Bronson’s early career as a powerful indictment of settler injustice. Her interventions are much more measured in Bronson’s more familiar 1944 text, Indians Are People, Too. Nevertheless, reading Bronson’s later nonfiction and early fiction illustrates the complexity of the Cherokee literary tradition theorized by Daniel Heath Justice as Bronson moves from resistant Chickamauga consciousness in her early fiction to Beloved Path writing in her later career, all the while advocating for Indigenous justice and sovereignty. This study contributes to broader debates regarding Native writings from the early twentieth century, when figures like Bronson demonstrated rhetorical savvy by moving between political and polemical writings, using literary fiction and nonfiction as vehicles to deliver powerful critiques of the settler state.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"72 3 1","pages":"36 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.44.1.0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This article offers a reading of the little-known 1925 short story “The Serpent” by Cherokee writer and political figure Ruth Muskrat Bronson. Published in the Mount Holyoke Monthly, “The Serpent” challenges federal policy during the allotment era, particularly the unparalleled power of Indian agents as key political figures during and after Oklahoma statehood. Bronson represents the threat of sexual violence during this time, forecasting the jurisdictional crisis that Native communities would continue to face up to the present. In response to these dangers to the Cherokee Nation and its citizens, Bronson’s story re-members Cherokee matrilineal and clan legal systems as her protagonist intervenes in the predatory advances of the Indian agent. The story, I argue, marks a turning point in Bronson’s early career as a powerful indictment of settler injustice. Her interventions are much more measured in Bronson’s more familiar 1944 text, Indians Are People, Too. Nevertheless, reading Bronson’s later nonfiction and early fiction illustrates the complexity of the Cherokee literary tradition theorized by Daniel Heath Justice as Bronson moves from resistant Chickamauga consciousness in her early fiction to Beloved Path writing in her later career, all the while advocating for Indigenous justice and sovereignty. This study contributes to broader debates regarding Native writings from the early twentieth century, when figures like Bronson demonstrated rhetorical savvy by moving between political and polemical writings, using literary fiction and nonfiction as vehicles to deliver powerful critiques of the settler state.
回顾露丝·穆斯克拉特·布朗森的《蛇》中的切罗基人的正义
摘要:本文介绍了切罗基作家兼政治人物露丝·穆斯克拉特·布朗森1925年鲜为人知的短篇小说《蛇》。《蛇》发表在《霍利奥克山月刊》上,挑战了分配时期的联邦政策,特别是在俄克拉何马州建立期间和之后,印第安人作为关键政治人物的无与伦比的权力。布朗森代表了这段时间性暴力的威胁,预测了土著社区将继续面临的司法危机。为了应对这些对切罗基民族及其公民的危险,布朗森的故事回忆了切罗基母系和氏族的法律制度,因为她的主角介入了印第安特工的掠夺性进步。我认为,这个故事标志着布朗森早期职业生涯的一个转折点,是对定居者不公正的有力控诉。布朗森1944年出版的《印度人也是人》一书中,她的介入更为慎重。然而,阅读布朗森后来的非小说和早期小说说明了切罗基文学传统的复杂性丹尼尔希斯正义理论布朗森从抵抗奇卡莫加意识在她早期的小说到心爱的道路写作在她后来的职业生涯中,一直倡导土著正义和主权。这项研究有助于从20世纪初开始对土著作品进行更广泛的辩论,当时像布朗森这样的人物通过在政治和辩论性作品之间移动来展示修辞技巧,使用文学小说和非小说作为工具,对移民国家进行有力的批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信