Infarction Patterns in Posterior Cerebral Circulation: Etiology and Prognosis

T. Alloush, R. Moustafa, M. Fouad, H. Ahmed, M. Hamdy
{"title":"Infarction Patterns in Posterior Cerebral Circulation: Etiology and Prognosis","authors":"T. Alloush, R. Moustafa, M. Fouad, H. Ahmed, M. Hamdy","doi":"10.4236/NM.2019.103012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Objectives: About a quarter of strokes and transient ischemic attacks occur in the vertebrobasilar distribution. Vertebrobasilar stroke is particularly prone to devastating consequences especially brain stem infarctions due to damage of the regional brain tissues that contain vital centers, and is associated with high rates of death and disability. Study Design: This was across sectional observational prospective hospital-based study conducted on 60 patients with first-ever acute posterior circulation ischemic stroke. The aim of the current study was to determine the relationship between different risk factors and different infarction patterns in posterior circulation; single small lacunar lesion, single large lesion, or multiple scattered lesions. Diagnosis of ischemic stroke and stroke subtypes were defined using the Trial of ORG 10,172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria as well as clinical and brain imaging features. Stroke severity using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was done on admission, after 24 hours from admission, and at 7 days from onset of symptoms. The patients functional status was assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS) done on admission and on discharge from hospital and at 7-day follow up from onset of symptoms. Patients were classified according to infarction patterns into a single small lacunar lesion (group I), a single large lesion (group II), and multiple scattered lesions (group III) 20 patients in each group. Results: There was no significant difference between the three groups as regard the presence of vascular risk factors and the only significant difference as regard vascular risk factors was atrial fibrillation (AF). There was significant difference between the three groups as regard the occurrence of previous transient ischemic attacks (TIA). There was significant difference between the three groups as regard NIHSS score on admission, after 24 hours, and at 7 days from admission. There were significant differences between the three groups as regard mRS score at discharge and at 7-day follow up from the onset of symptoms and the degree of improvement from admission to discharge. There was significant difference between the three groups as regard volume of infarction in Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group II and group III patients had larger volumes of infarction when compared to group I patients. There was no significant difference between the three groups as regard presence of significant intracranial stenosis in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). There was significant difference between the three groups as regard stroke etiology. It was found that largeartery atherosclerosis (LAA) was the most common stroke etiology in posterior circulation being present in (53.3%) of the patient group and was common in group II and III in contrast to group I patients. Conclusions: Different vascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking are present in all infarction patterns of posterior circulation ischemic stroke either single or multiple infarctions. However, AF and significant vertebrobasilar stenosis were mostly associated with large and multiple infarct lesion patterns. Small vessel disease was the most common stroke etiology for single small lacunar lesion while large artery atherosclerosis was associated with single large lesion and multiple lesions in the posterior circulation. Early MRI and MRA help in define type and prognosis of posterior circulation infarcts. Early diagnosis and control of potentially modifiable risk factors and comorbid conditions are an important aspect in the early management of patients with infarction in the posterior circulation.","PeriodicalId":19381,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/NM.2019.103012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objectives: About a quarter of strokes and transient ischemic attacks occur in the vertebrobasilar distribution. Vertebrobasilar stroke is particularly prone to devastating consequences especially brain stem infarctions due to damage of the regional brain tissues that contain vital centers, and is associated with high rates of death and disability. Study Design: This was across sectional observational prospective hospital-based study conducted on 60 patients with first-ever acute posterior circulation ischemic stroke. The aim of the current study was to determine the relationship between different risk factors and different infarction patterns in posterior circulation; single small lacunar lesion, single large lesion, or multiple scattered lesions. Diagnosis of ischemic stroke and stroke subtypes were defined using the Trial of ORG 10,172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria as well as clinical and brain imaging features. Stroke severity using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was done on admission, after 24 hours from admission, and at 7 days from onset of symptoms. The patients functional status was assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS) done on admission and on discharge from hospital and at 7-day follow up from onset of symptoms. Patients were classified according to infarction patterns into a single small lacunar lesion (group I), a single large lesion (group II), and multiple scattered lesions (group III) 20 patients in each group. Results: There was no significant difference between the three groups as regard the presence of vascular risk factors and the only significant difference as regard vascular risk factors was atrial fibrillation (AF). There was significant difference between the three groups as regard the occurrence of previous transient ischemic attacks (TIA). There was significant difference between the three groups as regard NIHSS score on admission, after 24 hours, and at 7 days from admission. There were significant differences between the three groups as regard mRS score at discharge and at 7-day follow up from the onset of symptoms and the degree of improvement from admission to discharge. There was significant difference between the three groups as regard volume of infarction in Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group II and group III patients had larger volumes of infarction when compared to group I patients. There was no significant difference between the three groups as regard presence of significant intracranial stenosis in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). There was significant difference between the three groups as regard stroke etiology. It was found that largeartery atherosclerosis (LAA) was the most common stroke etiology in posterior circulation being present in (53.3%) of the patient group and was common in group II and III in contrast to group I patients. Conclusions: Different vascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking are present in all infarction patterns of posterior circulation ischemic stroke either single or multiple infarctions. However, AF and significant vertebrobasilar stenosis were mostly associated with large and multiple infarct lesion patterns. Small vessel disease was the most common stroke etiology for single small lacunar lesion while large artery atherosclerosis was associated with single large lesion and multiple lesions in the posterior circulation. Early MRI and MRA help in define type and prognosis of posterior circulation infarcts. Early diagnosis and control of potentially modifiable risk factors and comorbid conditions are an important aspect in the early management of patients with infarction in the posterior circulation.
脑后循环梗死类型:病因和预后
研究目的:大约四分之一的中风和短暂性脑缺血发作发生在椎基底动脉分布。椎基底动脉中风尤其容易造成毁灭性的后果,特别是由于包含重要中枢的局部脑组织受损而导致的脑干梗死,并且与高死亡率和致残率有关。研究设计:这是一项基于医院的横断面观察性前瞻性研究,对60例首次急性后循环缺血性卒中患者进行了研究。当前研究的目的是确定不同危险因素与不同后循环梗死模式之间的关系;单个小腔隙性病变,单个大性病变,或多发分散性病变。缺血性脑卒中和脑卒中亚型的诊断使用急性脑卒中治疗(TOAST)标准以及临床和脑成像特征进行定义。采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分的卒中严重程度在入院时、入院后24小时和出现症状后7天进行评分。采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估患者入院、出院时的功能状态,并在症状出现后随访7天。根据梗死类型将患者分为单个小腔隙病灶(I组)、单个大病灶(II组)和多个分散病灶(III组),每组20例。结果:三组间血管危险因素无显著性差异,血管危险因素中唯一显著性差异为房颤(AF)。三组患者既往短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)发生率差异有统计学意义。三组患者入院时、入院后24小时、入院后7天的NIHSS评分差异均有统计学意义。三组患者在出院时的mRS评分和从症状出现到出院的7天随访时的mRS评分以及从入院到出院的改善程度均有显著差异。脑磁共振成像(MRI)显示三组患者脑梗死面积差异有统计学意义。与I组相比,II组和III组患者的梗死体积更大。三组在磁共振血管造影(MRA)中有无明显颅内狭窄无显著性差异。三组在脑卒中病因方面有显著性差异。研究发现,大动脉粥样硬化(LAA)是后循环卒中最常见的病因,占患者组的53.3%,与I组患者相比,II组和III组患者更常见。结论:不同的血管危险因素,如高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常和吸烟存在于所有后循环缺血性卒中的梗死模式中,无论是单梗死还是多发梗死。然而,房颤和明显的椎基底动脉狭窄大多与大面积和多发梗死灶相关。小血管病变是最常见的单一腔隙性病变,而大动脉粥样硬化则与单一大病变和后循环多发病变相关。早期MRI和MRA有助于确定后循环梗死的类型和预后。早期诊断和控制潜在可改变的危险因素和合并症是后循环梗死患者早期治疗的一个重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信