Çevrimiçi çoktan seçmeli değerlendirme aracının güvenilirliğinin genellenebilirlik kuramı ile değerlendirilmesi

Giray Kolcu, Mukadder İ̇nci Başer Kolcu, Sadettin Demir
{"title":"Çevrimiçi çoktan seçmeli değerlendirme aracının güvenilirliğinin genellenebilirlik kuramı ile değerlendirilmesi","authors":"Giray Kolcu, Mukadder İ̇nci Başer Kolcu, Sadettin Demir","doi":"10.15511/TJTFP.21.00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic in our country, it has been decided by the Higher Education Council (CoHE) to apply online measurement and evaluation in higher education, valid only for the pandemic period. Aim: In our study, it is aimed to evaluate the basic analyzes of the multiple-choice assessment tool, which is applied online for 1st year and 3rd commitee students at Süleyman Demirel University, with classical test and generalizability theory. Method: Our study is designed in quantitative research design. The population of the study was determined as first year students actively studying at Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine (n: 271). In the study, the 3rd commitee applied online to the 1st year students was analyzed with the multiple choice assessment tool SPSS and EduG. Results: When the exam was evaluated over 100 points, the average was 78.5 ± 11.05 (min: 27.4; max: 98.0), variance 122.229, kurtosis -1.196 and skewness 1.683. The average item difficulty was 0.785, the mean discrimination index was 0.262, and the reliability coefficient (KR-20) was 0.902. For the 95-item exam, the G value was calculated as 0.91 and the Phi value as 0.90. Discussion: Our faculty has also ensured the monitoring of measurement-evaluation practices in distance education in line with the recommendations of CoHE and the Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Medical Education Programs. Although the evaluation of a single assessment tool was considered as a limitation for our study, our study provided valuable information about the review of the basic analysis and assessment of the multiple-choice measurement tools. Based on this experience, we believe that the basic analysis of online measurement and evaluation applications can be preferred for the analysis of measurement tools after the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":22867,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Turkish Family Physician","volume":"3 4","pages":"3-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Turkish Family Physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15511/TJTFP.21.00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic in our country, it has been decided by the Higher Education Council (CoHE) to apply online measurement and evaluation in higher education, valid only for the pandemic period. Aim: In our study, it is aimed to evaluate the basic analyzes of the multiple-choice assessment tool, which is applied online for 1st year and 3rd commitee students at Süleyman Demirel University, with classical test and generalizability theory. Method: Our study is designed in quantitative research design. The population of the study was determined as first year students actively studying at Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine (n: 271). In the study, the 3rd commitee applied online to the 1st year students was analyzed with the multiple choice assessment tool SPSS and EduG. Results: When the exam was evaluated over 100 points, the average was 78.5 ± 11.05 (min: 27.4; max: 98.0), variance 122.229, kurtosis -1.196 and skewness 1.683. The average item difficulty was 0.785, the mean discrimination index was 0.262, and the reliability coefficient (KR-20) was 0.902. For the 95-item exam, the G value was calculated as 0.91 and the Phi value as 0.90. Discussion: Our faculty has also ensured the monitoring of measurement-evaluation practices in distance education in line with the recommendations of CoHE and the Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Medical Education Programs. Although the evaluation of a single assessment tool was considered as a limitation for our study, our study provided valuable information about the review of the basic analysis and assessment of the multiple-choice measurement tools. Based on this experience, we believe that the basic analysis of online measurement and evaluation applications can be preferred for the analysis of measurement tools after the pandemic.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信