Robustness of a U-net model for different image processing types in segmentation of the mammary gland region

Mika Yamamuro, Y. Asai, Naomi Hashimoto, Nao Yasuda, Hiroto Kimura, Takahiro Yamada, M. Nemoto, Yuichi Kimura, H. Handa, Hisashi Yoshida, K. Abe, M. Tada, H. Habe, T. Nagaoka, Seiun Nin, Kazunari Ishii, Yongbum Lee
{"title":"Robustness of a U-net model for different image processing types in segmentation of the mammary gland region","authors":"Mika Yamamuro, Y. Asai, Naomi Hashimoto, Nao Yasuda, Hiroto Kimura, Takahiro Yamada, M. Nemoto, Yuichi Kimura, H. Handa, Hisashi Yoshida, K. Abe, M. Tada, H. Habe, T. Nagaoka, Seiun Nin, Kazunari Ishii, Yongbum Lee","doi":"10.1117/12.2624139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many studies have assessed breast density in clinical practice. However, calculation of breast density requires segmentation of the mammary gland region, and deep learning has only recently been applied. Thus, the robustness of the deep learning model for different image processing types has not yet been reported. We investigated the accuracy of segmentation of the U-net for mammograms made with variousimage processing types. We used 478 mediolateral oblique view mammograms. The mammograms were divided into 390 training images and 88 testing images. The ground truth of the mammary gland region made by mammary experts was used for the training and testing datasets. Four types of image processing (Types 1–4) were applied to the testing images to compare breast density in the segmented mammary gland regions with that of ground truths. The shape agreement between ground truth and the segmented mammary gland region by U-net of Types 1–4 was assessed using the Dice coefficient, and the equivalence or compatibility of breast density with ground truth was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The mean Dice coefficients between the ground truth and U-net were 0.952, 0.948, 0.948, and 0.947 for Types 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. By Bland-Altman analysis, the equivalence of breast density between ground truth and U-net was confirmed for Types 1 and 2, and compatibility was confirmed for Types 3 and 4. We concluded that the robustness of the U-net for segmenting the mammary gland region was confirmed for different image processing types.","PeriodicalId":92005,"journal":{"name":"Breast imaging : 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 8-11, 2012 : proceedings. International Workshop on Breast Imaging (11th : 2012 : Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"8 2","pages":"122860T - 122860T-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast imaging : 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 8-11, 2012 : proceedings. International Workshop on Breast Imaging (11th : 2012 : Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2624139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies have assessed breast density in clinical practice. However, calculation of breast density requires segmentation of the mammary gland region, and deep learning has only recently been applied. Thus, the robustness of the deep learning model for different image processing types has not yet been reported. We investigated the accuracy of segmentation of the U-net for mammograms made with variousimage processing types. We used 478 mediolateral oblique view mammograms. The mammograms were divided into 390 training images and 88 testing images. The ground truth of the mammary gland region made by mammary experts was used for the training and testing datasets. Four types of image processing (Types 1–4) were applied to the testing images to compare breast density in the segmented mammary gland regions with that of ground truths. The shape agreement between ground truth and the segmented mammary gland region by U-net of Types 1–4 was assessed using the Dice coefficient, and the equivalence or compatibility of breast density with ground truth was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The mean Dice coefficients between the ground truth and U-net were 0.952, 0.948, 0.948, and 0.947 for Types 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. By Bland-Altman analysis, the equivalence of breast density between ground truth and U-net was confirmed for Types 1 and 2, and compatibility was confirmed for Types 3 and 4. We concluded that the robustness of the U-net for segmenting the mammary gland region was confirmed for different image processing types.
不同图像处理类型的U-net模型在乳腺区域分割中的鲁棒性
许多研究在临床实践中评估了乳腺密度。然而,计算乳腺密度需要对乳腺区域进行分割,深度学习直到最近才得到应用。因此,深度学习模型对不同图像处理类型的鲁棒性尚未得到报道。我们研究了不同图像处理类型的乳房x线照片U-net分割的准确性。我们使用了478张中外侧斜位x光片。乳房x光片分为390张训练图像和88张测试图像。训练和测试数据集采用乳腺专家给出的乳腺区域的ground truth。对测试图像进行四种类型的图像处理(类型1-4),将分割后的乳腺区域的乳腺密度与ground truth的乳腺密度进行比较。采用Dice系数评价基础真值与1-4型U-net分割乳腺区域的形状一致性,采用Bland-Altman分析评价乳腺密度与基础真值的等价性或相容性。类型1、类型2、类型3和类型4的ground truth与U-net之间的平均Dice系数分别为0.952、0.948、0.948和0.947。通过Bland-Altman分析,证实了1、2型乳腺密度与U-net的等效性,3、4型乳腺密度与U-net的相容性。我们的结论是,对于不同的图像处理类型,U-net对乳腺区域分割的鲁棒性得到了证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信