Estimation of Fetal Weight by Johnson’s Formula, Ultrasound and after Delivery

Sana Zahid Choudhry, M. Iqbal, N. Zahid
{"title":"Estimation of Fetal Weight by Johnson’s Formula, Ultrasound and after Delivery","authors":"Sana Zahid Choudhry, M. Iqbal, N. Zahid","doi":"10.7176/jmpb/65-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Objective : The ultimate objective of this study was to assess and validate the accuracy of fetal weight measurement by using Johnson’s formula and its comparison with fetal weight estimated by using ultrasound. Material and Method: This cross sectional study was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahwalpur. This study took 5 months (16, January 2018 to 20, July 2019). In this trial total number of 369 pregnant mothers were included and Systematic random sampling was used for selection of mothers. First mother was selected randomly. All the data entered and analyzed by computer software SPSS 23.2. The value of P=0.005 considered to be significant. Result: A total number of 100% (n=369) women were included in this study. The mean age, parity, height and weight of the patients was 29.12±4.02 years, 2.86±1.5parity, and 149.9±3.94 cm and 51.86±3.86 kg respectively. The study population comprised of 60.4% (n=223) illiterate and 39.6% (n=146) literate women. The age distribution showed 62.3% (n=230) women between 21-30 years 37.7% (n=139) between 31-40 years. There were 54.2% (n=200) women with height 140-150 cm and 45.8% (n=169) between 151-160 cm. It was observed that there were 36% (n=133) women had weight between 40-50 kg and 64% (n=236) had weight between 51-60 kg. There were 66.1% (n=244) women had parity between 1-3 and 33.9% (n=125) had parity between 4-6.The Johnson’s formula was seen to overestimate the fetal weight. To check the equality of means weight, one way ANOVA was applied, it was seen that all the variables i.e. Johnson’s formula, ultrasound and actual weight had the different means with significant p-value i.e. 0.000 having F-value 18.08. Conclusion : We can conclude from this study that the fetal weight estimated by Johnson’s formula is overestimated while ultrasound estimation of fetal weight always is near to actual weight after delivery. study, sample size was calculated by online source Openepi. con. The mothers with the singleton term pregnancy admitted either for normal vaginal delivery, induction labor or elective caesarean section were include in this study. Preterm labor, abnormal lie and presentation, ruptured membrane, polyhydramnios , unbooked women, multiple pregnancies, ante partum hemorrhage and eclampsia, oiygohyriumnios, anteriorly inserted placenta, poor visualization of fetal parts and uterine fibroids are included in exclusion criteria.","PeriodicalId":16339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jmpb/65-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Objective : The ultimate objective of this study was to assess and validate the accuracy of fetal weight measurement by using Johnson’s formula and its comparison with fetal weight estimated by using ultrasound. Material and Method: This cross sectional study was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahwalpur. This study took 5 months (16, January 2018 to 20, July 2019). In this trial total number of 369 pregnant mothers were included and Systematic random sampling was used for selection of mothers. First mother was selected randomly. All the data entered and analyzed by computer software SPSS 23.2. The value of P=0.005 considered to be significant. Result: A total number of 100% (n=369) women were included in this study. The mean age, parity, height and weight of the patients was 29.12±4.02 years, 2.86±1.5parity, and 149.9±3.94 cm and 51.86±3.86 kg respectively. The study population comprised of 60.4% (n=223) illiterate and 39.6% (n=146) literate women. The age distribution showed 62.3% (n=230) women between 21-30 years 37.7% (n=139) between 31-40 years. There were 54.2% (n=200) women with height 140-150 cm and 45.8% (n=169) between 151-160 cm. It was observed that there were 36% (n=133) women had weight between 40-50 kg and 64% (n=236) had weight between 51-60 kg. There were 66.1% (n=244) women had parity between 1-3 and 33.9% (n=125) had parity between 4-6.The Johnson’s formula was seen to overestimate the fetal weight. To check the equality of means weight, one way ANOVA was applied, it was seen that all the variables i.e. Johnson’s formula, ultrasound and actual weight had the different means with significant p-value i.e. 0.000 having F-value 18.08. Conclusion : We can conclude from this study that the fetal weight estimated by Johnson’s formula is overestimated while ultrasound estimation of fetal weight always is near to actual weight after delivery. study, sample size was calculated by online source Openepi. con. The mothers with the singleton term pregnancy admitted either for normal vaginal delivery, induction labor or elective caesarean section were include in this study. Preterm labor, abnormal lie and presentation, ruptured membrane, polyhydramnios , unbooked women, multiple pregnancies, ante partum hemorrhage and eclampsia, oiygohyriumnios, anteriorly inserted placenta, poor visualization of fetal parts and uterine fibroids are included in exclusion criteria.
约翰逊公式、超声及分娩后胎儿体重的估计
目的:本研究的最终目的是评估和验证约翰逊公式测量胎儿体重的准确性,并将其与超声测量胎儿体重的比较。材料与方法:本横断面研究在巴哈瓦尔维多利亚医院巴哈瓦尔布尔妇产科进行。本研究历时5个月(2018年1月16日至2019年7月20日)。本试验共纳入369名孕妇,采用系统随机抽样的方法选择孕妇。第一位母亲是随机选择的。所有数据均由计算机软件SPSS 23.2录入和分析。P=0.005的值被认为是显著的。结果:100% (n=369)的女性被纳入本研究。平均年龄29.12±4.02岁,平均胎次2.86±1.5次,平均身高149.9±3.94 cm,平均体重51.86±3.86 kg。研究人群中文盲占60.4% (n=223),识字妇女占39.6% (n=146)。年龄分布:21 ~ 30岁占62.3% (n=230), 31 ~ 40岁占37.7% (n=139)。身高140 ~ 150 cm的女性占54.2% (n=200),身高151 ~ 160 cm的女性占45.8% (n=169)。研究发现,36% (n=133)的女性体重在40-50 kg之间,64% (n=236)的女性体重在51-60 kg之间。66.1% (n=244)的女性胎次在1-3胎之间,33.9% (n=125)的女性胎次在4-6胎之间。约翰逊配方奶粉被认为高估了胎儿的体重。为了检验平均权重是否相等,采用单因素方差分析,可以看到Johnson公式、超声和实际体重的所有变量都有不同的均值,p值显著,即0.000,f值为18.08。结论:通过本研究我们可以得出结论,Johnson公式估算的胎儿体重存在高估,而超声估算的胎儿体重总是接近分娩后的实际体重。研究中,样本量通过在线源代码Openepi计算。本研究包括接受正常阴道分娩、引产或择期剖宫产的单胎足月妊娠母亲。排除标准包括早产、胎位异常、胎膜破裂、羊水过多、未预约妇女、多胎妊娠、产前出血、子痫、羊水过多、胎盘前置、胎儿部位可视性差、子宫肌瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信