Contact lens opacity grading system (CLOGS)

BSc, PhD, FBCO, FAAO Mark A. Hurst, BSc, MBCO Stewart E. Mitchell, MSc, PhD, FBCO, DCLP William A. Douthwaite
{"title":"Contact lens opacity grading system (CLOGS)","authors":"BSc, PhD, FBCO, FAAO Mark A. Hurst,&nbsp;BSc, MBCO Stewart E. Mitchell,&nbsp;MSc, PhD, FBCO, DCLP William A. Douthwaite","doi":"10.1016/S0141-7037(94)80013-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Grading and classification systems have been used in contact lens research for many years, despite a lack ofstandardisation. A new system for classifying the type of contact lens deposit and assessing its extent is presented. It makes use of five standard photographs for direct comparison purposes and allows decimal interpolation between grades. A further five photographs are included to allow differential identification of artefacts, scratches and spot deposits. This paper presents both intraobserver (coefficients of repeatability ±0.79, ±0.79 and ±0.76; Pearson correlation coefficients 0.94, <em>p</em>&lt;0.0001, 0.92, <em>p</em> &lt;0.0001 and 0.91, <em>p</em>&lt;0.0001) and interobserver repeatability (coefficients of repeatability ±1.13, ±1.09 and ±1.22; Pearson correlation coefficients 0.86, <em>p</em>&lt;0.0001, 0.90, <em>p</em>&lt;0.0001 and 0.84, <em>p</em>&lt;0.0001) results derived from three observers which demonstrate the reproducible nature of assessments when using this system. We therefore recommend this system for use in longitudinal studies, such as efficacy trials of contact lens care systems and clinical procedures involving contact lens deposits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","volume":"17 1","pages":"Pages 19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0141-7037(94)80013-8","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141703794800138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Grading and classification systems have been used in contact lens research for many years, despite a lack ofstandardisation. A new system for classifying the type of contact lens deposit and assessing its extent is presented. It makes use of five standard photographs for direct comparison purposes and allows decimal interpolation between grades. A further five photographs are included to allow differential identification of artefacts, scratches and spot deposits. This paper presents both intraobserver (coefficients of repeatability ±0.79, ±0.79 and ±0.76; Pearson correlation coefficients 0.94, p<0.0001, 0.92, p <0.0001 and 0.91, p<0.0001) and interobserver repeatability (coefficients of repeatability ±1.13, ±1.09 and ±1.22; Pearson correlation coefficients 0.86, p<0.0001, 0.90, p<0.0001 and 0.84, p<0.0001) results derived from three observers which demonstrate the reproducible nature of assessments when using this system. We therefore recommend this system for use in longitudinal studies, such as efficacy trials of contact lens care systems and clinical procedures involving contact lens deposits.

隐形眼镜透明度分级系统(CLOGS)
分级和分类系统已用于隐形眼镜研究多年,尽管缺乏标准化。提出了一种新的隐形眼镜沉积类型分类和程度评估系统。它使用五张标准照片进行直接比较,并允许在等级之间进行十进制插值。另外还包括五张照片,以便对文物、划痕和斑点沉积物进行鉴别。本文给出的观察者内重复性系数分别为±0.79、±0.79和±0.76;Pearson相关系数0.94,p<0.0001, 0.92, p<0.0001和0.91,p<0.0001)和观察者间重复性(重复性系数±1.13,±1.09和±1.22;Pearson相关系数0.86 (p<0.0001), 0.90 (p<0.0001)和0.84 (p<0.0001),这表明使用该系统时评估的可重复性。因此,我们建议将该系统用于纵向研究,例如隐形眼镜护理系统的疗效试验和涉及隐形眼镜沉积的临床程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信