A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Community-Based Diabetes Optimization Program for Patients Awaiting Elective Cardiac Surgery

Rohan M. Sanjanwala, C. White, B. Hiebert, D. Kent, C. Metge, M. Meade, S. Ludwig, R. Arora
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Community-Based Diabetes Optimization Program for Patients Awaiting Elective Cardiac Surgery","authors":"Rohan M. Sanjanwala, C. White, B. Hiebert, D. Kent, C. Metge, M. Meade, S. Ludwig, R. Arora","doi":"10.35248/2155-6156.19.10.825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The diabetes prevalence varies from 7%-20% among Cardiovascular Surgery (CS) patients. The patients with suboptimal glycaemic control are at a higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Objective: To explore feasibility and effectiveness of preoperative Diabetes Optimization Program (DOP). Design: Unblinded parallel group randomized controlled trial. Methods: Between 2013 to 2015, consecutive, consenting elective CS patients with HbA1C>7% were randomized to Standard of Care (SOC) group or to the DOP group. The DOP is a community-based diabetes education and optimization program. The SOC includes diabetes care from their Primary Care Physician (PCP). Outcome: The primary outcome was DOP feasibility. Secondarily, rate of change in HbA1C between the groups over the study period was evaluated. The DOP feasibility was assessed through the participants’ consent and adherence rate and generalized estimating equation was used for secondary outcomes analyses. Results: Thirty three out of 57 patients consented to participate in the study (consent rate 58%); 19 randomized to SOC group and 14 to the DOP group. The DOP group protocol adherence rate was 71%. There was no difference in the rate of HbA1C change between the groups over time (p=0.994). Conclusion: Providing preoperative diabetes optimization, through intervention such as DOP, for elective CS patients is feasible. Even so, its effectiveness reducing HbA1C appears comparable to the SOC in this feasibility trial. Perhaps, a shared diabetes care including the primary care provider and an integrated diabetes education and management program would resonate with the identified patients’ preference, with higher diabetes optimization efficacy.","PeriodicalId":15597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of diabetes & metabolism","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of diabetes & metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-6156.19.10.825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The diabetes prevalence varies from 7%-20% among Cardiovascular Surgery (CS) patients. The patients with suboptimal glycaemic control are at a higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Objective: To explore feasibility and effectiveness of preoperative Diabetes Optimization Program (DOP). Design: Unblinded parallel group randomized controlled trial. Methods: Between 2013 to 2015, consecutive, consenting elective CS patients with HbA1C>7% were randomized to Standard of Care (SOC) group or to the DOP group. The DOP is a community-based diabetes education and optimization program. The SOC includes diabetes care from their Primary Care Physician (PCP). Outcome: The primary outcome was DOP feasibility. Secondarily, rate of change in HbA1C between the groups over the study period was evaluated. The DOP feasibility was assessed through the participants’ consent and adherence rate and generalized estimating equation was used for secondary outcomes analyses. Results: Thirty three out of 57 patients consented to participate in the study (consent rate 58%); 19 randomized to SOC group and 14 to the DOP group. The DOP group protocol adherence rate was 71%. There was no difference in the rate of HbA1C change between the groups over time (p=0.994). Conclusion: Providing preoperative diabetes optimization, through intervention such as DOP, for elective CS patients is feasible. Even so, its effectiveness reducing HbA1C appears comparable to the SOC in this feasibility trial. Perhaps, a shared diabetes care including the primary care provider and an integrated diabetes education and management program would resonate with the identified patients’ preference, with higher diabetes optimization efficacy.
一项随机对照试验评估社区糖尿病优化方案等待择期心脏手术的患者
背景:心血管外科(CS)患者的糖尿病患病率在7%-20%之间。血糖控制不佳的患者术后发病率和死亡率较高。目的:探讨糖尿病术前优化方案(DOP)的可行性和有效性。设计:非盲平行组随机对照试验。方法:在2013年至2015年期间,连续的、同意HbA1C>7%的选择性CS患者被随机分为标准治疗组(SOC)或DOP组。DOP是一个以社区为基础的糖尿病教育和优化项目。SOC包括他们的初级保健医生(PCP)的糖尿病护理。结局:主要结局为DOP可行性。其次,评估研究期间各组之间HbA1C的变化率。通过参与者的同意率和依从率评估DOP的可行性,并使用广义估计方程进行次要结果分析。结果:57例患者中有33例同意参加研究(同意率58%);随机分为SOC组19例,DOP组14例。DOP组方案依从率为71%。各组间HbA1C随时间的变化率差异无统计学意义(p=0.994)。结论:通过DOP等干预措施对选择性CS患者进行术前糖尿病优化是可行的。即便如此,在这项可行性试验中,其降低HbA1C的效果似乎与SOC相当。也许,包括初级保健提供者和综合糖尿病教育和管理计划在内的共享糖尿病护理将与确定的患者的偏好产生共鸣,具有更高的糖尿病优化效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信