Doxastic Responsibility is Owed to Others

IF 0.5 4区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Journal of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5840/jpr201944149

Sanford C. Goldberg

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper I argue that Rik Peels’s account of doxastic responsibility (in his 2017 book Responsible Belief) is too subjectivist, as it fails to deliver the correct verdicts in some cases in which one’s responsibilities derive from a social role and where one has misleading higher-order evidence about the first-order evidence. The take-home point is that the notion of responsibility in doxastic responsibility is something that is owed to others.

查看原文本刊更多论文

责任在于他人

在本文中，我认为Rik Peels对责任的描述(在他2017年的书中负责任的信念)过于主观主义，因为它未能在某些情况下提供正确的判决，其中一个人的责任来自社会角色，并且一个人对一阶证据有误导性的高阶证据。关键的一点是，专制责任中的责任概念是对他人的责任。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Philosophical Research PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Philosophical Research is an annual peer-reviewed journal uniquely committed to the advancement of all areas of philosophical inquiry. It publishes articles from any philosophical orientation, in English or French, that make a significant contribution to the field. A generous length limit provides an outlet for essential works such as bibliographies, translations, and commentaries that are difficult to publish because of unusual length or complex format. JPR is particularly interested in helping new authors and an outstanding group of referees provides written comments on submitted manuscripts.