{"title":"Protocolo mixto para una revisión de literatura de economía política","authors":"A. Eslava, Julián Mazo-Zapata","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2019000200179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: El objetivo de este ensayo es presentar el procedimiento, hallazgos y lecciones de una revision de literatura soportada en elementos estructurados y sistematicos en una investigacion cuyo objetivo es encontrar condiciones de satisfaccion para una teoria integrada de la accion colectiva desde la economia politica. El resultado de este ejercicio es la exposicion de como la revision sistematica de literatura interioriza en el aspecto metodologico de las investigaciones cualitativas la intuicion de los autores, sin dejar de lado la asepsia de las revisiones estructuradas. El aporte radica entonces en discutir la importancia de la adopcion de reglas para la busqueda y revision bibliografica, al tiempo de advertir la necesidad de incorporar algunos criterios subjetivos para complementar dichas reglas rigidas que supone un protocolo estructurado. EnglishAbstract: This essay presents the procedure, findings and lessons of a review of literature supported by structured and systematic elements in a research whose objective is to find satisfaction conditions for an integrated theory of collective action from political economy. The result of this exercise is the exposition of how the systematic review of literature internalizes in the methodological aspect of qualitative research the intuition of the authors, without neglecting the asepsis of structured reviews. The contribution then lies in discussing the importance of adopting rules for searching and reviewing the literature, while noting the need to incorporate some subjective criteria to complement these rigid rules that are a structured protocol.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2019000200179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolResumen: El objetivo de este ensayo es presentar el procedimiento, hallazgos y lecciones de una revision de literatura soportada en elementos estructurados y sistematicos en una investigacion cuyo objetivo es encontrar condiciones de satisfaccion para una teoria integrada de la accion colectiva desde la economia politica. El resultado de este ejercicio es la exposicion de como la revision sistematica de literatura interioriza en el aspecto metodologico de las investigaciones cualitativas la intuicion de los autores, sin dejar de lado la asepsia de las revisiones estructuradas. El aporte radica entonces en discutir la importancia de la adopcion de reglas para la busqueda y revision bibliografica, al tiempo de advertir la necesidad de incorporar algunos criterios subjetivos para complementar dichas reglas rigidas que supone un protocolo estructurado. EnglishAbstract: This essay presents the procedure, findings and lessons of a review of literature supported by structured and systematic elements in a research whose objective is to find satisfaction conditions for an integrated theory of collective action from political economy. The result of this exercise is the exposition of how the systematic review of literature internalizes in the methodological aspect of qualitative research the intuition of the authors, without neglecting the asepsis of structured reviews. The contribution then lies in discussing the importance of adopting rules for searching and reviewing the literature, while noting the need to incorporate some subjective criteria to complement these rigid rules that are a structured protocol.
期刊介绍:
Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.