A digital audit of emergency upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy workflow in children with bilious vomiting

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Bradley C. Messiahs, R. Pitcher
{"title":"A digital audit of emergency upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy workflow in children with bilious vomiting","authors":"Bradley C. Messiahs, R. Pitcher","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Bilious vomiting in children requires an urgent evaluation with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopy as it may herald life-threatening midgut malrotation with volvulus (MMWV). There are no published data available on the duration of time-critical UGI workflow steps. Objectives A digital audit of workflow in emergency UGI contrast studies performed on children with bile-stained vomiting at a large South African teaching hospital. Method A retrospective study was conducted from 01 May 2012 – 31 May 2019. A customised search of the institutional radiology information system (RIS) defined all children with bilious vomiting who underwent emergency UGI fluoroscopy. Extracted RIS timestamps were used to calculate the median duration of the ‘approval’, ‘waiting’, ‘study’ and ‘reporting’ times. One-way analysis of variance and Chi-squared tests assessed the association between key parameters and the duration of workflow steps, with 5% significance (p < 0.05). Results Thirty-seven patients (n = 37) with median age 0.8 months were included, of whom 20 (54%) had an abnormal C-loop. The median ‘total time’ from physician request to report distribution was 107 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 67−173). The median ‘approval’ (6 min; IQR: 1–15) and ‘reporting’ (38 min; IQR: 17–91) times were the shortest and longest workflow steps, respectively. Abnormal C-loops (p = 0.04) and consultant referrals (p = 0.03) were associated with shorter ‘approval’ times. The neonatal ‘waiting’ time was significantly longer than that for older patients (p = 0.02). Conclusion The modern RIS is an excellent tool for time-critical workflow analyses, which can inform interventions for improved service delivery.","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"531 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Bilious vomiting in children requires an urgent evaluation with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopy as it may herald life-threatening midgut malrotation with volvulus (MMWV). There are no published data available on the duration of time-critical UGI workflow steps. Objectives A digital audit of workflow in emergency UGI contrast studies performed on children with bile-stained vomiting at a large South African teaching hospital. Method A retrospective study was conducted from 01 May 2012 – 31 May 2019. A customised search of the institutional radiology information system (RIS) defined all children with bilious vomiting who underwent emergency UGI fluoroscopy. Extracted RIS timestamps were used to calculate the median duration of the ‘approval’, ‘waiting’, ‘study’ and ‘reporting’ times. One-way analysis of variance and Chi-squared tests assessed the association between key parameters and the duration of workflow steps, with 5% significance (p < 0.05). Results Thirty-seven patients (n = 37) with median age 0.8 months were included, of whom 20 (54%) had an abnormal C-loop. The median ‘total time’ from physician request to report distribution was 107 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 67−173). The median ‘approval’ (6 min; IQR: 1–15) and ‘reporting’ (38 min; IQR: 17–91) times were the shortest and longest workflow steps, respectively. Abnormal C-loops (p = 0.04) and consultant referrals (p = 0.03) were associated with shorter ‘approval’ times. The neonatal ‘waiting’ time was significantly longer than that for older patients (p = 0.02). Conclusion The modern RIS is an excellent tool for time-critical workflow analyses, which can inform interventions for improved service delivery.
胆汁性呕吐儿童急诊上消化道透视工作流程的数字审计
背景:儿童胆汁性呕吐需要紧急进行上消化道(UGI)透视检查,因为它可能预示着危及生命的中肠旋转不良伴扭转(MMWV)。没有关于时间关键型UGI工作流步骤持续时间的公开数据。目的对南非一家大型教学医院对有胆汁染色呕吐的儿童进行紧急UGI对比研究的工作流程进行数字审计。方法2012年5月1日至2019年5月31日进行回顾性研究。对机构放射学信息系统(RIS)的定制搜索定义了所有接受紧急UGI透视检查的胆汁性呕吐儿童。提取的RIS时间戳用于计算“批准”、“等待”、“研究”和“报告”时间的中位数持续时间。单因素方差分析和卡方检验评估关键参数与工作流程步骤持续时间之间的相关性,显著性为5% (p < 0.05)。结果纳入37例患者(n = 37),中位年龄0.8个月,其中20例(54%)存在异常c环。从医生请求到报告分发的中位数“总时间”为107分钟(四分位数间距[IQR]: 67−173)。“批准”的中位数(6分钟;IQR: 1-15)和“报告”(38分钟;IQR: 17-91)次分别是最短和最长的工作流步骤。异常的c -loop (p = 0.04)和咨询师推荐(p = 0.03)与较短的“批准”时间相关。新生儿“等待”时间明显长于老年患者(p = 0.02)。结论:现代RIS是时间要求严格的工作流程分析的优秀工具,可以为改善服务提供干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信