Does Retirement Impact Health Care Utilization?

Norma B. Coe, Gema Zamarro
{"title":"Does Retirement Impact Health Care Utilization?","authors":"Norma B. Coe, Gema Zamarro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2714144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper is to estimate the causal effect of retirement on health care utilization. To do so, we use data from the 1992-2008 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the 2004-2006 waves of the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). In particular, we estimate the causal impact of retirement on health care utilization as measured by: doctor visits, visits to a general practitioner, nights in the hospital, and preventative care use. This paper uses panel data and instrumental variable methods, exploiting variation in statutory retirement ages across countries, to estimate the causal effects. Cross-country comparisons allow us to examine the role of a health care system’s use of the general practitioner as a gate keeper to specialists in this relationship. We find that while retirement is associated with increased health care use, our causal estimates show that retirement leads to fewer doctor visits in both the US and continental Europe. Nights in the hospital are unaffected by retirement status. Further we find that health care systems with primary care physicians who act as gatekeepers are particularly effective at decreasing doctor visits at retirement. Therefore, we conclude that increasing the statutory retirement age to help the solvency of the retirement systems will also increase doctor visits as individuals continue to work longer. In the US, the burden of this increased utilization will likely be borne by private insurance companies and public insurance to the extent it covers working individuals in their 60’s. European evidence suggests that this increase in doctor visits due to delayed retirement will be particularly evident in health systems without strong gatekeeper roles for general practitioners.","PeriodicalId":11036,"journal":{"name":"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal","volume":"238 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2714144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to estimate the causal effect of retirement on health care utilization. To do so, we use data from the 1992-2008 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the 2004-2006 waves of the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). In particular, we estimate the causal impact of retirement on health care utilization as measured by: doctor visits, visits to a general practitioner, nights in the hospital, and preventative care use. This paper uses panel data and instrumental variable methods, exploiting variation in statutory retirement ages across countries, to estimate the causal effects. Cross-country comparisons allow us to examine the role of a health care system’s use of the general practitioner as a gate keeper to specialists in this relationship. We find that while retirement is associated with increased health care use, our causal estimates show that retirement leads to fewer doctor visits in both the US and continental Europe. Nights in the hospital are unaffected by retirement status. Further we find that health care systems with primary care physicians who act as gatekeepers are particularly effective at decreasing doctor visits at retirement. Therefore, we conclude that increasing the statutory retirement age to help the solvency of the retirement systems will also increase doctor visits as individuals continue to work longer. In the US, the burden of this increased utilization will likely be borne by private insurance companies and public insurance to the extent it covers working individuals in their 60’s. European evidence suggests that this increase in doctor visits due to delayed retirement will be particularly evident in health systems without strong gatekeeper roles for general practitioners.
退休会影响医疗保健的利用吗?
摘要本研究的目的是估计退休对医疗保健利用的因果效应。为此,我们使用了1992-2008年健康与退休研究(HRS)和2004-2006年欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的数据。特别是,我们估计了退休对医疗保健利用的因果影响,通过以下指标来衡量:医生就诊次数、全科医生就诊次数、住院天数和预防性护理使用。本文使用面板数据和工具变量方法,利用各国法定退休年龄的差异来估计因果关系。跨国比较使我们能够检查卫生保健系统在这种关系中使用全科医生作为专家看门人的作用。我们发现,虽然退休与医疗保健使用的增加有关,但我们的因果估计表明,退休导致美国和欧洲大陆的医生就诊次数减少。医院的夜间工作不受退休状况的影响。此外,我们发现初级保健医生作为看门人的卫生保健系统在减少退休人员就诊方面特别有效。因此,我们得出结论,提高法定退休年龄以帮助退休制度的偿付能力,也会增加个人继续工作更长时间的医生访问。在美国,私人保险公司和公共保险公司可能会承担这种增加的负担,因为它涵盖了60多岁的在职个人。欧洲的证据表明,由于延迟退休而导致的就诊人数增加,在没有全科医生强有力的看门人作用的卫生系统中尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信