Breaking the Silence about the Animals We Eat

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Barnboken Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.14811/clr.v44.625
M. Koljonen
{"title":"Breaking the Silence about the Animals We Eat","authors":"M. Koljonen","doi":"10.14811/clr.v44.625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some 77 billion terrestrial animals are reared for human consumption globally every year. The moral implications of killing animals for food and the material conditions of these animals in intensive animal agriculture have seldom been discussed in children’s literature. The purpose of this article is to examine how these socially and culturally maintained silences are broken in two Nordic children’s picturebooks, Swedish Älskade lilla gris (Dear Little Pig, 1982) by Ulf Nilsson and Eva Eriksson and Finnish Kinkkulin jouluyllätys (Little Ham’s Christmas Surprise, 2010) by Teija Rekola and Timo Kästämä. The books’ pig protagonists are determined not to die, embodying the dualistic status inherent in the animality of farmed animals; they are subjects and objects, living beings and food-to-become. Further, this article explores the representation of the inherent value of so-called farmed animals and how it can be narrated-to-exist by concepts gleaned from Western animal rights philosophy, especially the capabilities approach by Martha Nussbaum. In the two books, inherent value is expressed in significantly different modes. Älskade lilla gris discusses multispecies families, autonomous animality, and emancipation, whereas Kinkkulin jouluyllätys uses a more traditional mode involving an anthropomorphic animal story, idyllic setting, and humanized subjectivity. Analysis focuses on the representation of nonhuman individuality, agency, sentience, animality, and interaction with humans. Both books present active and sentient individuals with varying degrees of animality. One celebrates its protagonist’s pighood but also contrasts it with the confined conditions of an animal industrial complex. The other employs a human-like pig protagonist on the run from his slaughterer and whose pighood is limited to his appearance and intended use. ","PeriodicalId":52259,"journal":{"name":"Barnboken","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Barnboken","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14811/clr.v44.625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some 77 billion terrestrial animals are reared for human consumption globally every year. The moral implications of killing animals for food and the material conditions of these animals in intensive animal agriculture have seldom been discussed in children’s literature. The purpose of this article is to examine how these socially and culturally maintained silences are broken in two Nordic children’s picturebooks, Swedish Älskade lilla gris (Dear Little Pig, 1982) by Ulf Nilsson and Eva Eriksson and Finnish Kinkkulin jouluyllätys (Little Ham’s Christmas Surprise, 2010) by Teija Rekola and Timo Kästämä. The books’ pig protagonists are determined not to die, embodying the dualistic status inherent in the animality of farmed animals; they are subjects and objects, living beings and food-to-become. Further, this article explores the representation of the inherent value of so-called farmed animals and how it can be narrated-to-exist by concepts gleaned from Western animal rights philosophy, especially the capabilities approach by Martha Nussbaum. In the two books, inherent value is expressed in significantly different modes. Älskade lilla gris discusses multispecies families, autonomous animality, and emancipation, whereas Kinkkulin jouluyllätys uses a more traditional mode involving an anthropomorphic animal story, idyllic setting, and humanized subjectivity. Analysis focuses on the representation of nonhuman individuality, agency, sentience, animality, and interaction with humans. Both books present active and sentient individuals with varying degrees of animality. One celebrates its protagonist’s pighood but also contrasts it with the confined conditions of an animal industrial complex. The other employs a human-like pig protagonist on the run from his slaughterer and whose pighood is limited to his appearance and intended use. 
打破对我们所吃动物的沉默
全球每年饲养约770亿只陆生动物供人类食用。在儿童文学中,为获取食物而杀害动物的道德含义以及集约化动物农业中这些动物的物质条件很少被讨论。本文的目的是研究这些社会和文化上保持的沉默是如何在两本北欧儿童绘本中被打破的:瑞典的Ulf Nilsson和Eva Eriksson的Älskade lilla gris(亲爱的小猪,1982年)和芬兰的Kinkkulin jouluyllätys(小火腿的圣诞惊喜,2010年)Teija Rekola和Timo Kästämä。书中的猪主角都是坚决不死的,体现了农场动物固有的二重性;他们是主体和客体,是生物和未来的食物。此外,本文探讨了所谓的养殖动物的内在价值的表现,以及如何通过从西方动物权利哲学中收集的概念,特别是玛莎·努斯鲍姆的能力方法来叙述它的存在。在这两本书中,内在价值的表达方式截然不同。Älskade《灰百合》讨论了多物种家庭、自主动物和解放,而《金库林》jouluyllätys采用了一种更传统的模式,包括拟人化的动物故事、田园诗般的环境和人性化的主体性。分析的重点是非人类的个性、代理、感觉、动物性和与人类的互动的表现。这两本书都表现了不同程度的动物性的活跃和有感情的个体。其中一部歌颂了主人公的猪性,但也将其与动物工业园区的受限条件进行了对比。另一个故事的主角是一只长得像人的猪,他正在逃离他的屠夫,他的猪之美仅限于他的外表和预期用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Barnboken
Barnboken Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信