Evaluation of the SU2 Open-Source Code for a Hypersonic Flow at Mach Number 5

IF 2.8 Q2 MECHANICS
Jia-Ming Yeap, Z. Rana, L. Könözsy, K. Jenkins
{"title":"Evaluation of the SU2 Open-Source Code for a Hypersonic Flow at Mach Number 5","authors":"Jia-Ming Yeap, Z. Rana, L. Könözsy, K. Jenkins","doi":"10.32973/jcam.2022.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the evaluation of the Stanford University Unstructured (SU2) open-source computational software package for a high Mach number 5 flow. The test case selected is an impinging shock wave turbulent boundary layer interaction (SWTBLI) on a flat plate where the experimental data of Sch¨ulein et al. [27] is used for validation purposes. Two turbulence models, the Spalart–Allmaras (SA) and the k-ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) within the SU2 code are evaluated in this study. Flow parameters, such as skin friction, wall pressure distribution and boundary layer profiles are compared with experimental values. The results demonstrate the performance of the SU2 code at a high Mach number flow and highlight its limitations in predicting fluid flow physics. At higher shock generator angles, the discrepancy between experimental and CFD data is more significant. Within the interaction and flow separation zones, a smaller separation bubble and delayed separation are predicted by the SA model while the k-ω SST model predicts early separation. Both models are able to predict wall pressure distribution correctly within the experimental values. However, discrepancies were observed in the prediction of skin friction due to the inability of the models to capture the boundary layer recovery after shock impingement.","PeriodicalId":47168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32973/jcam.2022.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the evaluation of the Stanford University Unstructured (SU2) open-source computational software package for a high Mach number 5 flow. The test case selected is an impinging shock wave turbulent boundary layer interaction (SWTBLI) on a flat plate where the experimental data of Sch¨ulein et al. [27] is used for validation purposes. Two turbulence models, the Spalart–Allmaras (SA) and the k-ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) within the SU2 code are evaluated in this study. Flow parameters, such as skin friction, wall pressure distribution and boundary layer profiles are compared with experimental values. The results demonstrate the performance of the SU2 code at a high Mach number flow and highlight its limitations in predicting fluid flow physics. At higher shock generator angles, the discrepancy between experimental and CFD data is more significant. Within the interaction and flow separation zones, a smaller separation bubble and delayed separation are predicted by the SA model while the k-ω SST model predicts early separation. Both models are able to predict wall pressure distribution correctly within the experimental values. However, discrepancies were observed in the prediction of skin friction due to the inability of the models to capture the boundary layer recovery after shock impingement.
5马赫数高超声速流的SU2开源代码评估
本文对斯坦福大学非结构化(SU2)开源高马赫数流计算软件包进行了评价。本文选择的测试用例是平板上的撞击激波湍流边界层相互作用(SWTBLI),其中采用Sch¨ulein等[27]的实验数据进行验证。本文对SU2规范中的两个湍流模型Spalart-Allmaras (SA)和k-ω剪切应力输运(SST)进行了评估。将表面摩擦、壁面压力分布和边界层轮廓等流动参数与实验值进行了比较。结果证明了SU2程序在高马赫数流动中的性能,并突出了其在预测流体流动物理方面的局限性。当激波发生器角度较大时,实验数据与CFD数据的差异更大。在相互作用和流动分离区内,SA模型预测分离泡较小,分离延迟,而k-ω SST模型预测分离提前。两种模型均能在实验值范围内准确预测壁面压力分布。然而,由于模型无法捕捉冲击后的边界层恢复,因此在皮肤摩擦的预测中观察到差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics aims to provide a medium for dissemination of innovative and consequential papers on mathematical and computational methods in theoretical as well as applied mechanics. Manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a blind peer reviewing procedure conducted by the editorial board. The Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics devoted to the all fields of solid and fluid mechanics. The journal also welcomes papers that are related to the recent technological advances such as biomechanics, electro-mechanics, advanced materials and micor/nano-mechanics. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to, the following topic areas: -Theoretical and experimental mechanics- Dynamic systems & control- Nonlinear dynamics and chaos- Boundary layer theory- Turbulence and hydrodynamic stability- Multiphase flows- Heat and mass transfer- Micro/Nano-mechanics- Structural optimization- Smart materials and applications- Composite materials- Hydro- and aerodynamics- Fluid-structure interaction- Gas dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信