Analysis of the use of blood parameters in COPD and ACOS for the purposes of disease differentiation

D. Zorlu
{"title":"Analysis of the use of blood parameters in COPD and ACOS for the purposes of disease differentiation","authors":"D. Zorlu","doi":"10.3892/wasj.2021.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The definition of asthma‑chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) has recently been changed to ‘ACO’ in cases in which certain clinical manifestations of both asthma and COPD are present. In ACO, difficulties in diagnosis and differential diagnosis occur, since inflammation and related pathophysiological changes cannot be clearly demonstrated. In the present study, blood parameters were evaluated with regards to the differ‑ ential diagnosis of ACO‑COPD and are presented with the aim of providing an approach that is easy to apply in daily practice. The present study was conducted in February, 2020 on patients who presented to the pulmonology department. A total of 50 patients with COPD and 51 patients with ACO who were newly diagnosed were included in the study. The results revealed that there were significant differences between the ACO and COPD groups in terms of their neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, platelet (PLT) and C‑reactive protein (CRP) counts, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (P<0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of their eosinophil ratio and mean platelet volume (MPV) count (P>0.05). The mean neutrophil count, NLR, PLR and CRP values were significantly higher in the COPD group than the ACO group. In the ACO group, the mean PLT and lymphocyte count values were significantly higher than those in the COPD group. According to the findings of the present study, although role of inflammation in ACO has not been fully clarified, the presence of eosinophilia in ACO does not significantly contribute to the differential diagnosis of COPD. MPV also lacks clinically significant differential properties in COPD and ACO. However, the mean PLT and lymphocyte counts were significantly higher in the ACO than in the COPD group, which maybe a promising result in the differential diagnosis of COPD. Thus, the present study may provide insight into the differential diagnosis between 55.2% among patients with COPD and between 13.3 and 61.0% among patients with asthma alone (7). In another, multicenter, cross‑sectional, observational study, the number of patients","PeriodicalId":87378,"journal":{"name":"World Academy of Sciences journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Academy of Sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2021.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The definition of asthma‑chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) has recently been changed to ‘ACO’ in cases in which certain clinical manifestations of both asthma and COPD are present. In ACO, difficulties in diagnosis and differential diagnosis occur, since inflammation and related pathophysiological changes cannot be clearly demonstrated. In the present study, blood parameters were evaluated with regards to the differ‑ ential diagnosis of ACO‑COPD and are presented with the aim of providing an approach that is easy to apply in daily practice. The present study was conducted in February, 2020 on patients who presented to the pulmonology department. A total of 50 patients with COPD and 51 patients with ACO who were newly diagnosed were included in the study. The results revealed that there were significant differences between the ACO and COPD groups in terms of their neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, platelet (PLT) and C‑reactive protein (CRP) counts, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (P<0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of their eosinophil ratio and mean platelet volume (MPV) count (P>0.05). The mean neutrophil count, NLR, PLR and CRP values were significantly higher in the COPD group than the ACO group. In the ACO group, the mean PLT and lymphocyte count values were significantly higher than those in the COPD group. According to the findings of the present study, although role of inflammation in ACO has not been fully clarified, the presence of eosinophilia in ACO does not significantly contribute to the differential diagnosis of COPD. MPV also lacks clinically significant differential properties in COPD and ACO. However, the mean PLT and lymphocyte counts were significantly higher in the ACO than in the COPD group, which maybe a promising result in the differential diagnosis of COPD. Thus, the present study may provide insight into the differential diagnosis between 55.2% among patients with COPD and between 13.3 and 61.0% among patients with asthma alone (7). In another, multicenter, cross‑sectional, observational study, the number of patients
COPD与ACOS血液参数辨证应用分析
. 哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)重叠综合征(ACOS)的定义最近在同时存在哮喘和COPD某些临床表现的病例中更改为“ACO”。在ACO中,由于炎症和相关病理生理变化不能清楚地显示,因此诊断和鉴别诊断存在困难。在本研究中,血液参数与慢性阻塞性肺疾病的不同诊断进行了评估,目的是提供一种易于在日常实践中应用的方法。本研究于2020年2月在肺科就诊的患者中进行。共纳入50例COPD患者和51例新诊断的ACO患者。结果显示,ACO组与COPD组在中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数、血小板(PLT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)计数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)方面差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。COPD组平均中性粒细胞计数、NLR、PLR、CRP值均显著高于ACO组。ACO组平均PLT和淋巴细胞计数明显高于COPD组。根据本研究结果,尽管炎症在ACO中的作用尚未完全明确,但ACO中嗜酸性粒细胞增多的存在对COPD的鉴别诊断没有显著的帮助。MPV在COPD和ACO中也缺乏临床显著的差异。然而,ACO组的平均PLT和淋巴细胞计数明显高于COPD组,这可能是COPD鉴别诊断的一个有希望的结果。因此,本研究可能为55.2%的COPD患者和13.3%至61.0%的单独哮喘患者的鉴别诊断提供见解(7)。在另一项多中心、横断面、观察性研究中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信