Linking disturbance and stream invertebrate communities: how best to measure bed stability

A. Schwendel, R. Death, I. Fuller, M. Joy
{"title":"Linking disturbance and stream invertebrate communities: how best to measure bed stability","authors":"A. Schwendel, R. Death, I. Fuller, M. Joy","doi":"10.1899/09-172.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Substrate stability is a key determinant of stream invertebrate community composition, but its measurement can be problematic. Stream ecologists often use different approaches and techniques to quantify bed stability, and this variability makes comparison among studies difficult. We examined the link between 6 reach-scale measures of substrate stability and invertebrate community metrics in 12 New Zealand mountain streams. The strength of the link varied with the method used to define substrate stability. We used morphological budgeting to measure spatial patterns and volumes of scour and fill. We found that as erosion of sediments increased, invertebrate diversity declined exponentially. In particular, increases in the volume of scour reduced taxonomic richness, whereas deposition of coarse sediments was less relevant for invertebrate communities. Overall, the distance travelled by in-situ-marked tracer stones was most strongly linked with all invertebrate community metrics, whereas the bottom component of the Pfankuch Index related very well to diversity. Both metrics showed near-linear declines in diversity with decreasing stability. In contrast, the link between invertebrate communities and the proportion of bed area affected by entrainment was weak. Therefore, we propose tracer-based indices and the Pfankuch bottom component as the most suitable measures for research involving invertebrate–substrate-stability relationships. Measures derived from in-situ-marked tracer stones reflected only entrainment and transport of particles. In contrast, the bottom component of the Pfankuch Index encompassed the widest range of bed-stability characteristics but is prone to observer bias. An objective method that combines the efficiency of the Pfankuch Index with the characteristics measured using tracer stones could serve as a powerful explanatory tool in stream ecology.","PeriodicalId":49987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the North American Benthological Society","volume":" 20","pages":"11 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1899/09-172.1","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the North American Benthological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1899/09-172.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Abstract Substrate stability is a key determinant of stream invertebrate community composition, but its measurement can be problematic. Stream ecologists often use different approaches and techniques to quantify bed stability, and this variability makes comparison among studies difficult. We examined the link between 6 reach-scale measures of substrate stability and invertebrate community metrics in 12 New Zealand mountain streams. The strength of the link varied with the method used to define substrate stability. We used morphological budgeting to measure spatial patterns and volumes of scour and fill. We found that as erosion of sediments increased, invertebrate diversity declined exponentially. In particular, increases in the volume of scour reduced taxonomic richness, whereas deposition of coarse sediments was less relevant for invertebrate communities. Overall, the distance travelled by in-situ-marked tracer stones was most strongly linked with all invertebrate community metrics, whereas the bottom component of the Pfankuch Index related very well to diversity. Both metrics showed near-linear declines in diversity with decreasing stability. In contrast, the link between invertebrate communities and the proportion of bed area affected by entrainment was weak. Therefore, we propose tracer-based indices and the Pfankuch bottom component as the most suitable measures for research involving invertebrate–substrate-stability relationships. Measures derived from in-situ-marked tracer stones reflected only entrainment and transport of particles. In contrast, the bottom component of the Pfankuch Index encompassed the widest range of bed-stability characteristics but is prone to observer bias. An objective method that combines the efficiency of the Pfankuch Index with the characteristics measured using tracer stones could serve as a powerful explanatory tool in stream ecology.
连接扰动和溪流无脊椎动物群落:如何最好地测量床的稳定性
摘要基质稳定性是河流无脊椎动物群落组成的关键决定因素,但其测量可能存在问题。溪流生态学家经常使用不同的方法和技术来量化河床的稳定性,这种可变性使得研究之间的比较变得困难。我们研究了新西兰12条山涧中6种尺度尺度的基质稳定性和无脊椎动物群落指标之间的联系。连接的强度随定义基板稳定性的方法而变化。我们使用形态预算来测量冲刷和填充的空间模式和体积。我们发现,随着沉积物侵蚀的增加,无脊椎动物的多样性呈指数下降。特别是,冲刷体积的增加降低了分类丰富度,而粗沉积物的沉积与无脊椎动物群落的相关性较小。总体而言,就地标记的示踪石行进的距离与所有无脊椎动物群落指标的关系最为密切,而Pfankuch指数的底部成分与多样性的关系非常好。这两个指标都显示出多样性随稳定性下降而近似线性下降。相比之下,无脊椎动物群落与受夹带影响的床面积比例之间的联系较弱。因此,我们提出基于示踪剂的指数和Pfankuch底部分量是研究无脊椎动物-基质-稳定性关系的最合适的措施。从原位标记的示踪石中得出的测量结果只反映了粒子的夹带和运输。相比之下,Pfankuch指数的底部组成部分包含了最广泛的床稳定性特征,但容易受到观察者的偏见。将Pfankuch指数的效率与示踪石测量的特征相结合的客观方法可以作为溪流生态学的有力解释工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
Journal of the North American Benthological Society 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书