Kajian Hukum Penerapan Ketentuan Hukuman Mati dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Grenaldo Ginting
{"title":"Kajian Hukum Penerapan Ketentuan Hukuman Mati dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi","authors":"Grenaldo Ginting","doi":"10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corruption is categorized as an extraordinary crime where the impact can be very detrimental to the country and can even have a very bad impact on the economy and development of the country. Efforts to deal with and eradicate criminal acts of corruption as meant in Law Number 31 of 1999 which has been amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, put forward several important points and main ideas and are considered capable of providing a deterrent effect against the perpetrators of this extraordinary crime, namely the principle of reversed proof and severe legal sanctions, including the death penalty. This research is a normative legal research. The main characteristics of normative legal science research in conducting legal studies are primary and secondary legal materials, using interpretation methods, and using normative juridical analysis. The result of this research is that the regulation on capital punishment in the PTPK Law is stated in Article 2 paragraph (2) which formulates \"in the event that a criminal act of corruption as referred to in paragraph (1) is committed in certain circumstances the death penalty can be imposed\". The specific situation in question is a situation that can be used as a reason for criminal aggravation for perpetrators of corruption, namely if the crime is committed against funds earmarked for overcoming a dangerous situation. Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution formulates that: \"Indonesia is a state based on law\". The consequence of a rule of law is the protection of human rights, including the right to life. Thus, the imposition of death penalty for corruptors who have been hampered by human rights issues, especially the right to life can be upheld.","PeriodicalId":31072,"journal":{"name":"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corruption is categorized as an extraordinary crime where the impact can be very detrimental to the country and can even have a very bad impact on the economy and development of the country. Efforts to deal with and eradicate criminal acts of corruption as meant in Law Number 31 of 1999 which has been amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, put forward several important points and main ideas and are considered capable of providing a deterrent effect against the perpetrators of this extraordinary crime, namely the principle of reversed proof and severe legal sanctions, including the death penalty. This research is a normative legal research. The main characteristics of normative legal science research in conducting legal studies are primary and secondary legal materials, using interpretation methods, and using normative juridical analysis. The result of this research is that the regulation on capital punishment in the PTPK Law is stated in Article 2 paragraph (2) which formulates "in the event that a criminal act of corruption as referred to in paragraph (1) is committed in certain circumstances the death penalty can be imposed". The specific situation in question is a situation that can be used as a reason for criminal aggravation for perpetrators of corruption, namely if the crime is committed against funds earmarked for overcoming a dangerous situation. Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution formulates that: "Indonesia is a state based on law". The consequence of a rule of law is the protection of human rights, including the right to life. Thus, the imposition of death penalty for corruptors who have been hampered by human rights issues, especially the right to life can be upheld.
《腐败刑法》中对死刑条款的法律适用研究
腐败被归类为一种特殊的犯罪,其影响可能对国家非常有害,甚至可能对国家的经济和发展产生非常糟糕的影响。根据1999年第31号法律(2001年第20号法律对其进行了修正)所提出的处理和根除腐败犯罪行为的努力,提出了若干要点和主要思想,并被认为能够对这一特殊罪行的肇事者产生威慑作用,即反证原则和严厉的法律制裁,包括死刑。本研究是一项规范性法律研究。规范法学研究开展法律研究的主要特点是:一手法、第二手法、解释法、规范法分析法。这项研究的结果是,《反腐败法》关于死刑的规定载于第2条第(2)款,其中规定"如果在某些情况下犯下第(1)款所述的腐败犯罪行为,可判处死刑"。所述的具体情况是一种可以作为腐败行为人加重刑事责任的理由的情况,即如果犯罪是针对专门用于克服危险情况的资金而实施的。1945年《宪法》第1条第(3)款规定:“印度尼西亚是一个以法律为基础的国家”。法治的结果是保护人权,包括生命权。因此,可以支持对因人权问题,特别是生命权问题而受到阻碍的腐败分子判处死刑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum  Pranata Sosial
Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信