Looking around The Marble Faun: Visuality, Authorship, and Authority

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
C. Reed
{"title":"Looking around The Marble Faun: Visuality, Authorship, and Authority","authors":"C. Reed","doi":"10.1353/jnc.2022.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Nathaniel Hawthorne's last and longest novel, The Marble Faun, was his most popular in the nineteenth century, but it has long troubled literary critics and scholars. This essay by an art historian uses philosopher VilémFlusser's theories of modern forms of visuality to explore how this book about Americans in Italy functioned both as text and as a physical object.Flusser's analysis of the challenge to forms of authority linked to authorship enacted by modern visual technologies illuminates the descriptive digressions and illogical plot that critics complained of in Hawthorne's text, and suggest why this book, in the so-called Tauchnitz edition, lent itself to extravagant practices of binding and extra-illustration.Emphasizing the narration's many invitations to interpretation and revision, the essay concludes by analyzing a surprising omission from Hawthorne's story structured around Roman tourist sites: the Sistine Chapel. Taking up critiques of Michelangelo's frescos by Hawthorne and his Anglophone Protestant contemporaries, the essay argues that The Marble Faun proposes itself as a reformulation of this famous text-based artwork in ways that engage mental habits that supplant linear reading with looking around.","PeriodicalId":41876,"journal":{"name":"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jnc.2022.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Nathaniel Hawthorne's last and longest novel, The Marble Faun, was his most popular in the nineteenth century, but it has long troubled literary critics and scholars. This essay by an art historian uses philosopher VilémFlusser's theories of modern forms of visuality to explore how this book about Americans in Italy functioned both as text and as a physical object.Flusser's analysis of the challenge to forms of authority linked to authorship enacted by modern visual technologies illuminates the descriptive digressions and illogical plot that critics complained of in Hawthorne's text, and suggest why this book, in the so-called Tauchnitz edition, lent itself to extravagant practices of binding and extra-illustration.Emphasizing the narration's many invitations to interpretation and revision, the essay concludes by analyzing a surprising omission from Hawthorne's story structured around Roman tourist sites: the Sistine Chapel. Taking up critiques of Michelangelo's frescos by Hawthorne and his Anglophone Protestant contemporaries, the essay argues that The Marble Faun proposes itself as a reformulation of this famous text-based artwork in ways that engage mental habits that supplant linear reading with looking around.
环视大理石羊怪:视觉性、作者身份和权威
摘要:纳撒尼尔·霍桑的最后一部长篇小说《大理石羊怪》是他在19世纪最受欢迎的一部小说,但长期以来一直困扰着文学评论家和学者。这篇由艺术史学家撰写的文章运用了哲学家维尔姆·弗卢瑟的现代视觉形式理论,探讨了这本关于美国人在意大利的书是如何作为文本和实物发挥作用的。弗卢瑟分析了现代视觉技术对与作者身份相关的权威形式的挑战,阐明了批评家们在霍桑的文本中所抱怨的描述性的离题和不合逻辑的情节,并提出了为什么这本书,在所谓的塔奇尼茨版本中,倾向于过度的装订和额外插图。这篇文章强调了叙述的许多解释和修订的邀请,最后分析了霍桑围绕罗马旅游景点的故事中一个令人惊讶的遗漏:西斯廷教堂。在霍桑和他的英语新教徒同时代人对米开朗基罗壁画的批评中,这篇文章认为,《大理石羊怪》是对这一著名的基于文本的艺术作品的一种重新塑造,以一种吸引思维习惯的方式,取代了线性阅读和环顾四周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信