Echoes of Colonial Logic in Re-Ordering “Public” Streets

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY
Beth E. Notar, K. Min, Raju Gautam
{"title":"Echoes of Colonial Logic in Re-Ordering “Public” Streets","authors":"Beth E. Notar, K. Min, Raju Gautam","doi":"10.3167/TRANS.2018.080305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates three historical moments in Rangoon, Burma (Yangon,\nMyanmar) when the city has restricted certain forms of mobility. The first occurred\nin 1920, when British authorities restricted rickshaws pulled by Indian\nlaborers. The second was in 1960, when the military “caretaker government”\nsought to sideline pedicabs and horse carts as part of an urban “cleanup”\ncampaign. The third happened in 2017, when city authorities under a new\ndemocratic government sought to limit the number of taxis and allow digital\nride-hailing services such as Uber and Grab to operate in the city. Despite three\nvery different forms of government, the later discourses eerily echo the exclusionary\nlogic that certain forms of migrant driven mobility need to be cleared\naway for more “modern” mobility.","PeriodicalId":43789,"journal":{"name":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/TRANS.2018.080305","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/TRANS.2018.080305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article investigates three historical moments in Rangoon, Burma (Yangon, Myanmar) when the city has restricted certain forms of mobility. The first occurred in 1920, when British authorities restricted rickshaws pulled by Indian laborers. The second was in 1960, when the military “caretaker government” sought to sideline pedicabs and horse carts as part of an urban “cleanup” campaign. The third happened in 2017, when city authorities under a new democratic government sought to limit the number of taxis and allow digital ride-hailing services such as Uber and Grab to operate in the city. Despite three very different forms of government, the later discourses eerily echo the exclusionary logic that certain forms of migrant driven mobility need to be cleared away for more “modern” mobility.
“公共”街道重新排序中的殖民逻辑回声
这篇文章调查了缅甸仰光的三个历史时刻,当时这个城市限制了某些形式的流动性。第一次发生在1920年,当时英国当局限制了印度劳工拉的人力车。第二次是在1960年,当时军方“看守政府”试图取缔三轮车和马车,作为城市“清理”运动的一部分。第三次发生在2017年,当时新民主政府领导下的市政府试图限制出租车数量,并允许Uber和Grab等数字叫车服务在该市运营。尽管有三种不同形式的政府,但后来的论述怪异地呼应了排斥性逻辑,即某些形式的移民驱动的流动性需要被清除,以实现更“现代”的流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信