{"title":"Echoes of Colonial Logic in Re-Ordering “Public” Streets","authors":"Beth E. Notar, K. Min, Raju Gautam","doi":"10.3167/TRANS.2018.080305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates three historical moments in Rangoon, Burma (Yangon,\nMyanmar) when the city has restricted certain forms of mobility. The first occurred\nin 1920, when British authorities restricted rickshaws pulled by Indian\nlaborers. The second was in 1960, when the military “caretaker government”\nsought to sideline pedicabs and horse carts as part of an urban “cleanup”\ncampaign. The third happened in 2017, when city authorities under a new\ndemocratic government sought to limit the number of taxis and allow digital\nride-hailing services such as Uber and Grab to operate in the city. Despite three\nvery different forms of government, the later discourses eerily echo the exclusionary\nlogic that certain forms of migrant driven mobility need to be cleared\naway for more “modern” mobility.","PeriodicalId":43789,"journal":{"name":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/TRANS.2018.080305","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/TRANS.2018.080305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This article investigates three historical moments in Rangoon, Burma (Yangon,
Myanmar) when the city has restricted certain forms of mobility. The first occurred
in 1920, when British authorities restricted rickshaws pulled by Indian
laborers. The second was in 1960, when the military “caretaker government”
sought to sideline pedicabs and horse carts as part of an urban “cleanup”
campaign. The third happened in 2017, when city authorities under a new
democratic government sought to limit the number of taxis and allow digital
ride-hailing services such as Uber and Grab to operate in the city. Despite three
very different forms of government, the later discourses eerily echo the exclusionary
logic that certain forms of migrant driven mobility need to be cleared
away for more “modern” mobility.