Why Must Justification Guarantee Truth?

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Logos and Episteme Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5840/logos-episteme201910440

H. Sankey

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This reply provides further grounds to doubt Mizrahi’s argument for an infallibilist theory of knowledge. It is pointed out that the fact that knowledge requires both truth and justification does not entail that the level of justification required for knowledge be sufficient to guarantee truth. In addition, an argument presented by Mizrahi appears to equivocate with respect to the interpretation of the phrase “p cannot be false”.

查看原文本刊更多论文

为什么称义必须保证真理?

这个回答提供了进一步的理由来怀疑米兹拉希关于知识的无谬误论的论点。有人指出，知识既需要真理又需要证明，这一事实并不意味着知识所需的证明程度足以保证真理。此外，Mizrahi提出的一个论点似乎对" p不可能是假的"这个短语的解释模棱两可。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Logos and Episteme Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： the journal publishes articles, reviews or discussion notes focused as well on problems concerning the general theory of knowledge, as on problems specific to the philosophy, methodology and ethics of science, philosophical logic, metaphilosophy, moral epistemology, epistemology of art, epistemology of religion, social or political epistemology, epistemology of communication. Studies in the history of science and of the philosophy of knowledge, or studies in the sociology of knowledge, cognitive psychology, and cognitive science are also welcome.