The “Arab Exceptionalism” Re-examined from the Legal Perspective of Human Rights

Q3 Social Sciences
Antonio‐Martín Porras‐Gómez
{"title":"The “Arab Exceptionalism” Re-examined from the Legal Perspective of Human Rights","authors":"Antonio‐Martín Porras‐Gómez","doi":"10.1525/caa.2020.13.2.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study re-examines the phenomenon of “Arab exceptionalism” from the perspective of human rights’ recognition. The formal changes introduced since 2004 in the new Arab bills of rights (comprising the Arab Charter on Human Rights plus the bills of rights of the new constitutions of Iraq, Morocco, Tunisia, and Egypt) are presented and analyzed with the purpose of answering the following questions: From a descriptive–analytical perspective, are the new Arab bills of rights adopting similar designs? From a formal perspective, do these new designs imply a shift with respect to previous patterns of Arab exceptionalism? Finally, from an explanatory perspective, is there an evolutionary rationale accounting for the specific designs adopted in the new Arab bills of rights?","PeriodicalId":39004,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Arab Affairs","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Arab Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/caa.2020.13.2.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The study re-examines the phenomenon of “Arab exceptionalism” from the perspective of human rights’ recognition. The formal changes introduced since 2004 in the new Arab bills of rights (comprising the Arab Charter on Human Rights plus the bills of rights of the new constitutions of Iraq, Morocco, Tunisia, and Egypt) are presented and analyzed with the purpose of answering the following questions: From a descriptive–analytical perspective, are the new Arab bills of rights adopting similar designs? From a formal perspective, do these new designs imply a shift with respect to previous patterns of Arab exceptionalism? Finally, from an explanatory perspective, is there an evolutionary rationale accounting for the specific designs adopted in the new Arab bills of rights?
人权法学视角下的“阿拉伯例外论”
本研究从人权认识的角度重新审视“阿拉伯例外论”现象。自2004年以来,新的阿拉伯人权法案(包括《阿拉伯人权宪章》和伊拉克、摩洛哥、突尼斯和埃及新宪法的权利法案)中引入的正式变化,旨在回答以下问题:从描述性分析的角度来看,新的阿拉伯权利法案是否采用类似的设计?从正式的角度来看,这些新的设计是否意味着对先前阿拉伯例外论模式的转变?最后,从解释性的角度来看,新的阿拉伯权利法案中采用的具体设计是否有一个进化的理论基础?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Arab Affairs
Contemporary Arab Affairs Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信