{"title":"Jewish Echoes of Anti-Talmudic Literature: Revisiting \"The Talmud in the Additiones of Paul of Burgos\"","authors":"Yosi Yisraeli","doi":"10.1353/ajs.2022.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article revisits two Latin antitalmudic texts penned by the converted bishop of Burgos, Pablo de Santa María (c. 1352–1435). It argues, in contrast to previous assessments, that far from being a failed replica of Christian scholastic formulas, they echo the conversionist or \"apostatic\" argumentation that proselytes to Christianity were making in Jewish quarters, a polemic that was not shaped by a scholastic-inquisitorial perspective but rather was still very much rabbinic in style and methods. The article traces echoes of this intra-Jewish polemic, using the extraordinary corpus of Abner of Burgos (d. 1347). It focuses on three themes: the antirabbinic allusions to Zechariah's prophecy; the historical-hermeneutical brawl over the identity of Edom; and the notion of talmudic-demonic alliance. Evaluating the potential agency that Pablo's peculiar texts could have had among Christian readership, I propose that his critique of talmudic literature undermined important aspects of the Christian antitalmudic tradition, reframing the Talmud according to rabbinic conventions.","PeriodicalId":54106,"journal":{"name":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","volume":"56 1","pages":"347 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2022.0046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:This article revisits two Latin antitalmudic texts penned by the converted bishop of Burgos, Pablo de Santa María (c. 1352–1435). It argues, in contrast to previous assessments, that far from being a failed replica of Christian scholastic formulas, they echo the conversionist or "apostatic" argumentation that proselytes to Christianity were making in Jewish quarters, a polemic that was not shaped by a scholastic-inquisitorial perspective but rather was still very much rabbinic in style and methods. The article traces echoes of this intra-Jewish polemic, using the extraordinary corpus of Abner of Burgos (d. 1347). It focuses on three themes: the antirabbinic allusions to Zechariah's prophecy; the historical-hermeneutical brawl over the identity of Edom; and the notion of talmudic-demonic alliance. Evaluating the potential agency that Pablo's peculiar texts could have had among Christian readership, I propose that his critique of talmudic literature undermined important aspects of the Christian antitalmudic tradition, reframing the Talmud according to rabbinic conventions.
摘要:本文回顾了布尔戈斯主教Pablo de Santa María(约1352-1435)撰写的两篇拉丁反犹太法典文本。它认为,与之前的评估相反,它们远不是基督教经院公式的失败复制品,它们呼应了皈依基督教的人或“叛教者”在犹太人居住区的论点,这种辩论不是由经院调查的观点形成的,而是在风格和方法上仍然非常拉比。这篇文章追溯了这种犹太内部争论的回声,使用了布尔戈斯的阿布纳(公元1347年)的非凡语料库。它集中于三个主题:对撒迦利亚预言的反拉比暗示;关于以东身份的历史诠释学争论;还有犹太法典和恶魔联盟的概念。在评估巴勃罗的独特文本可能对基督教读者产生的潜在影响时,我认为他对塔木德文学的批评破坏了基督教反塔木德传统的重要方面,根据拉比惯例重新构建了塔木德。