A survey on brazilian dentists’ awareness, perception, and knowledge of bisphosphonates

Q4 Dentistry
Raquel Laís Ottoni Nunes, Nicole Ribeiro dos Anjos, Luciano Henrique Ferreira Lima, Ana Paula Cota Viana, Larissa de Ávila Pereira, Fábio Fernandes Borém Bruzinga, S. Grossmann
{"title":"A survey on brazilian dentists’ awareness, perception, and knowledge of bisphosphonates","authors":"Raquel Laís Ottoni Nunes, Nicole Ribeiro dos Anjos, Luciano Henrique Ferreira Lima, Ana Paula Cota Viana, Larissa de Ávila Pereira, Fábio Fernandes Borém Bruzinga, S. Grossmann","doi":"10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8667544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of the study was to analyze the knowledge of dentists in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, about bisphosphonates and their clinical implications. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted with a convenience sample of dentists in Belo Horizonte, in a period of 8 weeks. The questionnaire was self-applied and was structured with 10 items about the dentists’ demographic characteristics, professional profile, and knowledge about bisphosphonates. Associations in the data were analyzed by with the Fischer’s exact test with a significance level of 5%. Results: Of the 214 participating dentists, 163 (76.17%) were women, and 51 (23.83%) were men, with age ranged for 21 to 73 years (mean of 30 years) and mean of 6 years of professional activity. Nearly half (106/49.53%) reported having knowledge about bisphosphonates, and undergraduate courses were the primary source of such information (73/34.11%). Osteoporosis was the most identified indication for use (75/35.04%), although no participants correctly identified all indications. Regarding the drugs’ side effects, only three dentists (1.40%) could correctly identify all responses, with bone necrosis being recognized by the majority (88/41.12%). Sodium alendronate (54/25.23%) and sodium ibandronate (15/7.01%) were the most identified examples of bisphosphonates. Last, only nine dentists (4.20%) could identify all examples of the drugs, and their capacity was associated with self-reported knowledge (p<0.05). Conclusions: More information about bisphosphonates should be disseminated in Belo Horizonte, ideally via better approaches in local undergraduate and postgraduate courses. Until then, knowledge of the basic aspects of bisphosphonates will remain limited.","PeriodicalId":34984,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8667544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the study was to analyze the knowledge of dentists in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, about bisphosphonates and their clinical implications. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted with a convenience sample of dentists in Belo Horizonte, in a period of 8 weeks. The questionnaire was self-applied and was structured with 10 items about the dentists’ demographic characteristics, professional profile, and knowledge about bisphosphonates. Associations in the data were analyzed by with the Fischer’s exact test with a significance level of 5%. Results: Of the 214 participating dentists, 163 (76.17%) were women, and 51 (23.83%) were men, with age ranged for 21 to 73 years (mean of 30 years) and mean of 6 years of professional activity. Nearly half (106/49.53%) reported having knowledge about bisphosphonates, and undergraduate courses were the primary source of such information (73/34.11%). Osteoporosis was the most identified indication for use (75/35.04%), although no participants correctly identified all indications. Regarding the drugs’ side effects, only three dentists (1.40%) could correctly identify all responses, with bone necrosis being recognized by the majority (88/41.12%). Sodium alendronate (54/25.23%) and sodium ibandronate (15/7.01%) were the most identified examples of bisphosphonates. Last, only nine dentists (4.20%) could identify all examples of the drugs, and their capacity was associated with self-reported knowledge (p<0.05). Conclusions: More information about bisphosphonates should be disseminated in Belo Horizonte, ideally via better approaches in local undergraduate and postgraduate courses. Until then, knowledge of the basic aspects of bisphosphonates will remain limited.
巴西牙医对双膦酸盐的认识、认知和知识的调查
目的:本研究的目的是分析巴西贝洛奥里藏特牙医对双膦酸盐的知识及其临床意义。方法:采用横断面调查问卷法对贝洛奥里藏特的方便样本牙医进行为期8周的研究。问卷采用自填方式,共10个项目,内容涉及牙医的人口统计学特征、专业概况和双磷酸盐知识。数据中的关联用Fischer精确检验进行分析,显著性水平为5%。结果:214名参与调查的牙医中,女性163名(76.17%),男性51名(23.83%),年龄21 ~ 73岁,平均30岁,平均从业时间6年。近一半(106/49.53%)的受访者表示了解双膦酸盐,本科课程是这些信息的主要来源(73/34.11%)。骨质疏松症是使用适应症最多的(75% /35.04%),尽管没有参与者正确识别所有适应症。对于药物的不良反应,仅有3名牙医(1.40%)能正确识别所有反应,大多数牙医(88/41.12%)能识别出骨坏死。阿仑膦酸钠(54/25.23%)和伊班膦酸钠(15/7.01%)是最常见的双磷酸盐。最后,仅有9名牙医(4.20%)能够识别出所有的药物示例,其识别能力与自述知识相关(p<0.05)。结论:在贝洛奥里藏特应该传播更多关于双膦酸盐的信息,最好是在当地的本科和研究生课程中采用更好的方法。在此之前,对双膦酸盐基本方面的了解仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences is an international non-profit journal, which publishes full-Length papers, original research reports, literature reviews, special reports, clinical cases, current topics and short communications, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信