Assessment of growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) under surface and subsurface drip irrigation using treated waste water

IF 1.2 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
M. Mahmoudi, M. Khelil, Rim Ghrib, B. Douh, A. Boujelben
{"title":"Assessment of growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) under surface and subsurface drip irrigation using treated waste water","authors":"M. Mahmoudi, M. Khelil, Rim Ghrib, B. Douh, A. Boujelben","doi":"10.30486/IJROWA.2020.1891410.1031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Due to increasing water demand in worldwide, treated wastewater (TWW) will become an important component in agriculture, particularly in countries facing the water scarcity. Using judiciously the already existing water resources in agriculture production can be proved by using efficient irrigation method. MethodsThis study investigates the impact of two irrigation water quality including; treated wastewater (TWW) and tap water (FW) with two modes of drip irrigation; subsurface at different depth (5, 15 and 25 cm depth) and surface drip irrigation on yield production and growth parameters of okra during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons. Okra was chosen for its economical and nutritional values. Results Results revealed that the maximum agronomic performance of okra was recorded with TWW by comparing it with FW. SDI also offers more reliable growth and yield data than surface irrigation. TWW influenced positively the growth parameters and yield attitudes of okra. Plant height was maximum in WSDI25 treatment with 257 cm and 214 cm, in 2017 and 2018, respectively followed by WSDI15 and WSDI5 then WSDI0. The same order was observed for the different treatments in the plot by irrigated by FW. Fruit number per plant was observed to be maximum in WSDI5 (55.8) and WSDI15 (54.8), and minimum in FSDI0 (33.8) and FSDI5 (33.7). Okra yield was maximum in WSDI5 treatment (4.59 t/ha) and minimum in FSDI0 treatment (2.2 t/ha) in 2017. Conclusion The results of this study showed that application of TWW under (5 -15) cm depth of drip line is recommended for higher productivity of okra.","PeriodicalId":14373,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30486/IJROWA.2020.1891410.1031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Due to increasing water demand in worldwide, treated wastewater (TWW) will become an important component in agriculture, particularly in countries facing the water scarcity. Using judiciously the already existing water resources in agriculture production can be proved by using efficient irrigation method. MethodsThis study investigates the impact of two irrigation water quality including; treated wastewater (TWW) and tap water (FW) with two modes of drip irrigation; subsurface at different depth (5, 15 and 25 cm depth) and surface drip irrigation on yield production and growth parameters of okra during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons. Okra was chosen for its economical and nutritional values. Results Results revealed that the maximum agronomic performance of okra was recorded with TWW by comparing it with FW. SDI also offers more reliable growth and yield data than surface irrigation. TWW influenced positively the growth parameters and yield attitudes of okra. Plant height was maximum in WSDI25 treatment with 257 cm and 214 cm, in 2017 and 2018, respectively followed by WSDI15 and WSDI5 then WSDI0. The same order was observed for the different treatments in the plot by irrigated by FW. Fruit number per plant was observed to be maximum in WSDI5 (55.8) and WSDI15 (54.8), and minimum in FSDI0 (33.8) and FSDI5 (33.7). Okra yield was maximum in WSDI5 treatment (4.59 t/ha) and minimum in FSDI0 treatment (2.2 t/ha) in 2017. Conclusion The results of this study showed that application of TWW under (5 -15) cm depth of drip line is recommended for higher productivity of okra.
废水处理下地表和地下滴灌秋葵生长及产量评价
由于世界范围内对水的需求不断增加,处理过的废水将成为农业的重要组成部分,特别是在面临水资源短缺的国家。合理利用农业生产中已有的水资源可以通过采用有效的灌溉方法来证明。方法本研究考察了两种灌溉水质的影响因素:处理废水(TWW)和自来水(FW)采用两种滴灌方式;不同埋深(5、15和25 cm)和地表滴灌对2017和2018年秋葵产量、生产和生长参数的影响。选择秋葵是因为它的经济和营养价值。结果通过与FW的比较,发现TWW能记录秋葵的最大农艺性能。SDI还提供了比地面灌溉更可靠的生长和产量数据。TWW对秋葵的生长参数和产量态度有正向影响。WSDI25处理的株高在2017年和2018年最高,分别为257 cm和214 cm,其次是WSDI15和WSDI5,然后是WSDI0。FW灌地不同处理的顺序相同。单株果数以WSDI5(55.8)和WSDI15(54.8)最高,FSDI0(33.8)和FSDI5(33.7)最低。2017年,WSDI5处理的秋葵产量最高(4.59 t/ha), FSDI0处理的秋葵产量最低(2.2 t/ha)。结论黄秋葵建议在(5 ~ 15)cm滴管深度下施用TWW,以提高黄秋葵的产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
26.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture is an open access journal that publishes high-quality solicited and unsolicited articles, in all areas of Recycling of organic waste including: -Solid waste reuse in agriculture -Waste water reuse in agriculture -Utilization of organic wastes: composting -Ways to reduce, reuse and recycle organic waste -Social and economic impact of reduction, reuse and recycling of organic waste in agriculture -Methods to raise the public awareness of recycling and reuse of organic waste in agriculture -Organic waste utilization in animal and poultry nutrition -Urban food waste composting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信