Analysis of Death Risk of COVID-19 under Incomplete Information1

Chongfu Huang
{"title":"Analysis of Death Risk of COVID-19 under Incomplete Information1","authors":"Chongfu Huang","doi":"10.2991/jracr.k.200709.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 outbreak was first reported in the city of Wuhan, central China’s Hubei Province, in December 2019. Experts have attributed the outbreak to a novel coronavirus that has since spread across China and abroad with confirmed cases exceeding 234,000 globally, death toll of coronavirus tops 11,000 [1], on March 21, 2020. The disease has been named “coronavirus disease 2019” (abbreviated “COVID-19”). When the disease started to spread in China, authorities reacted with historically unprecedented quarantines of cities. On February 27, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) raised the risk assessment of COVID-19 from “high” to “very high” at global level. However, the concept of the risk of COVID-19 is still unclear today, and risk communication is not smooth. Before the outbreak, information about the disease was incomplete and traditional risk analysis tools were unable to provide any support. Holding the hope that the virus does not pass from human to human, meanwhile some political considerations, people lost the opportunity to control the source of infection early, causing serious losses. If a more reliable risk analysis was carried out before and at the beginning of the outbreak, and if a strengthen crisis response was took immediately, the situation will certainly be much better. It is the same for almost all disasters, the story after the events is easy to tell, but the risk analysis before the events is not easy. One reason is that the information available for risk analysis before and at the beginning of the outbreak is incomplete.","PeriodicalId":31887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response JRACR","volume":"48 7","pages":"43-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response JRACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/jracr.k.200709.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak was first reported in the city of Wuhan, central China’s Hubei Province, in December 2019. Experts have attributed the outbreak to a novel coronavirus that has since spread across China and abroad with confirmed cases exceeding 234,000 globally, death toll of coronavirus tops 11,000 [1], on March 21, 2020. The disease has been named “coronavirus disease 2019” (abbreviated “COVID-19”). When the disease started to spread in China, authorities reacted with historically unprecedented quarantines of cities. On February 27, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) raised the risk assessment of COVID-19 from “high” to “very high” at global level. However, the concept of the risk of COVID-19 is still unclear today, and risk communication is not smooth. Before the outbreak, information about the disease was incomplete and traditional risk analysis tools were unable to provide any support. Holding the hope that the virus does not pass from human to human, meanwhile some political considerations, people lost the opportunity to control the source of infection early, causing serious losses. If a more reliable risk analysis was carried out before and at the beginning of the outbreak, and if a strengthen crisis response was took immediately, the situation will certainly be much better. It is the same for almost all disasters, the story after the events is easy to tell, but the risk analysis before the events is not easy. One reason is that the information available for risk analysis before and at the beginning of the outbreak is incomplete.
不完全信息下新冠肺炎死亡风险分析
2019年12月,中国中部湖北省武汉市首次报道了新冠肺炎疫情。专家们将此次疫情归因于一种新型冠状病毒,该病毒已在国内外蔓延,截至2020年3月21日,全球确诊病例超过23.4万例,冠状病毒死亡人数超过1.1万人[1]。这种疾病被命名为“2019冠状病毒病”(简称“COVID-19”)。当这种疾病开始在中国传播时,当局采取了历史上前所未有的城市隔离措施。2020年2月27日,世界卫生组织将全球新冠肺炎风险评估从“高”上调至“非常高”。然而,今天,COVID-19风险的概念仍然不明确,风险沟通并不顺利。在疫情爆发之前,关于该疾病的信息不完整,传统的风险分析工具无法提供任何支持。抱着病毒不会在人与人之间传播的希望,同时出于一些政治上的考虑,人们失去了及早控制传染源的机会,造成了严重的损失。如果在疫情爆发之前和开始时进行更可靠的风险分析,并立即采取更强有力的危机应对措施,情况肯定会好得多。几乎所有的灾难都是一样的,事后的故事很容易讲,但事前的风险分析却不容易。一个原因是,在疫情爆发之前和开始时可用于风险分析的信息是不完整的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信