Evidence and practitioners' knowledge : some comments on a current discussion

IF 0.1 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Håkan Jenner
{"title":"Evidence and practitioners' knowledge : some comments on a current discussion","authors":"Håkan Jenner","doi":"10.1108/TC-01-2017-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this paper is to give a pedagogics-based contribution to the discussion about evidence-based practice (EBP) and its implementation, with substance abuse treatment as an area of interest. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThe paper takes its starting point in two different ways of looking at knowledge – as a product or as a process – and from there, the implications regarding the therapeutic encounter, staff training, and evaluation are examined. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe reasoning reveals the importance of process thinking when it comes to developing the work field in a more comprehensive way. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nBy the pedagogics-based view on EBP the paper illuminates aspects that may broaden a further discussion.","PeriodicalId":43236,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Communities","volume":"65 S1","pages":"193-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/TC-01-2017-0003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-01-2017-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to give a pedagogics-based contribution to the discussion about evidence-based practice (EBP) and its implementation, with substance abuse treatment as an area of interest. Design/methodology/approach The paper takes its starting point in two different ways of looking at knowledge – as a product or as a process – and from there, the implications regarding the therapeutic encounter, staff training, and evaluation are examined. Findings The reasoning reveals the importance of process thinking when it comes to developing the work field in a more comprehensive way. Originality/value By the pedagogics-based view on EBP the paper illuminates aspects that may broaden a further discussion.
证据和从业者的知识:对当前讨论的一些评论
本文的目的是为基于证据的实践(EBP)及其实施的讨论提供基于教学法的贡献,其中药物滥用治疗是一个感兴趣的领域。设计/方法/方法本文从两种不同的看待知识的方式开始——作为产品或作为过程——并从那里开始,对治疗遭遇、员工培训和评估的影响进行了检查。这一推理揭示了过程思维在更全面地发展工作领域方面的重要性。本文从教育学的角度出发,阐述了一些可以拓展进一步讨论的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Communities
Therapeutic Communities SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes academic papers, case studies, empirical research and opinion. The Journal is interested in publishing papers that critically creatively engage with ideas drawn from a range of discourses: the therapeutic community movement and other related professional practice, psychoanalysis, art, literature, poetry, music, architecture, culture, education, philosophy, religion and environmental studies. It will be of value to those who work in health services, social services, voluntary and charitable organizations and for all professionals involved with staff teams in therapeutic and supportive organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信