Effect of different chelating agents on the wettability of CeraSeal and AH Plus sealers to intraradicular dentin: An in vitro study

Q3 Dentistry
Aastha Dureja, T. Purayil, N. Ballal, S. George
{"title":"Effect of different chelating agents on the wettability of CeraSeal and AH Plus sealers to intraradicular dentin: An in vitro study","authors":"Aastha Dureja, T. Purayil, N. Ballal, S. George","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_17_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A good wettability of an endodontic sealer plays an important role in creating a fluid impervious seal within the root canal. The chelator employed during endodontic irrigation modifies the intraradicular dentin surface and alters the wettability of the sealer. Hence, the aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the effect of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 7% maleic acid (MA), and 9% hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP) on the wettability of CeraSeal and AH Plus sealers. Materials and Methods: Forty-four single rooted premolars were decoronated followed by longitudinal sectioning into 88 halves. They were randomly allocated into 4 groups (n = 22) based on the irrigation regimen: Group I (2.5% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl] +17% EDTA), Group II (2.5% NaOCl + 7% MA), Group III (2.5% NaOCl + 9% HEDP) and Group IV (2.5% NaOCl + distilled water). Each group was subdivided into two subgroups (n = 11) according to the type of sealer employed: CeraSeal sealer and AH Plus sealer. The contact angle was measured using contact angle telescope goniometer. Comparison between the sealers for each group was done using independent t-test and multiple comparisons of irrigants and sealers in various combinations were done using Two-way Analysis of Variance (P < 0.05). Results: The wettability of CeraSeal sealer on intraradicular dentin was the most favorable when 9% HEDP was employed as the final irrigant, whereas the wettability of AH Plus sealer on intra radicular dentin was most favorable with 7% MA as the final irrigant. AH Plus sealer showed better wettability than CeraSeal sealer in all the respective groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: AH Plus showed maximum wettability with 7% MA as the final irrigant, whereas, CeraSeal sealer showed the best wettability with 9% HEDP as the final irrigant.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"4 6","pages":"248 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_17_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A good wettability of an endodontic sealer plays an important role in creating a fluid impervious seal within the root canal. The chelator employed during endodontic irrigation modifies the intraradicular dentin surface and alters the wettability of the sealer. Hence, the aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the effect of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 7% maleic acid (MA), and 9% hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP) on the wettability of CeraSeal and AH Plus sealers. Materials and Methods: Forty-four single rooted premolars were decoronated followed by longitudinal sectioning into 88 halves. They were randomly allocated into 4 groups (n = 22) based on the irrigation regimen: Group I (2.5% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl] +17% EDTA), Group II (2.5% NaOCl + 7% MA), Group III (2.5% NaOCl + 9% HEDP) and Group IV (2.5% NaOCl + distilled water). Each group was subdivided into two subgroups (n = 11) according to the type of sealer employed: CeraSeal sealer and AH Plus sealer. The contact angle was measured using contact angle telescope goniometer. Comparison between the sealers for each group was done using independent t-test and multiple comparisons of irrigants and sealers in various combinations were done using Two-way Analysis of Variance (P < 0.05). Results: The wettability of CeraSeal sealer on intraradicular dentin was the most favorable when 9% HEDP was employed as the final irrigant, whereas the wettability of AH Plus sealer on intra radicular dentin was most favorable with 7% MA as the final irrigant. AH Plus sealer showed better wettability than CeraSeal sealer in all the respective groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: AH Plus showed maximum wettability with 7% MA as the final irrigant, whereas, CeraSeal sealer showed the best wettability with 9% HEDP as the final irrigant.
不同螯合剂对CeraSeal和AH +密封剂对根内牙本质润湿性的影响:体外研究
导读:良好的根管密封剂的润湿性对于在根管内形成流体密封起着重要的作用。在根管冲洗过程中使用的螯合剂可以改变根内牙本质表面并改变密封剂的润湿性。因此,本研究的目的是评估和比较17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、7%马来酸(MA)和9%羟乙基二膦酸(HEDP)对CeraSeal和AH Plus密封剂润湿性的影响。材料与方法:对44颗单根前磨牙进行装饰,纵切成88半。根据灌溉方案随机分为4组(n = 22):组I(2.5%次氯酸钠[NaOCl] +17% EDTA),组II (2.5% NaOCl + 7% MA),组III (2.5% NaOCl + 9% HEDP)和组IV (2.5% NaOCl +蒸馏水)。每组根据所使用的封口器类型再分为两个亚组(n = 11): CeraSeal封口器和AH Plus封口器。采用接触角望远镜测角仪测量接触角。各组灌封剂间比较采用独立t检验,灌封剂和灌封剂不同组合间的多重比较采用双向方差分析(P < 0.05)。结果:以9% HEDP作为最终冲洗剂时,CeraSeal密封剂对根状牙本质的润湿性最好,而以7% MA作为最终冲洗剂时,AH Plus密封剂对根状牙本质的润湿性最好。AH Plus密封剂的润湿性优于CeraSeal密封剂(P < 0.05)。结论:以7% MA为最终冲洗剂时,AH Plus的润湿性最好,而以9% HEDP为最终冲洗剂时,CeraSeal密封剂的润湿性最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信