The “Breeding of Humanity”: Nietzsche and Shaw’s Man and Superman

IF 0.6 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Reinhard G. Mueller
{"title":"The “Breeding of Humanity”: Nietzsche and Shaw’s Man and Superman","authors":"Reinhard G. Mueller","doi":"10.5325/shaw.39.2.0183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Nietzsche and Shaw are famous and infamous: famous for their innovative and influential forms of writing, but infamous for their apparent support of totalitarianism and Nazism. However, while it has long been shown that Nietzsche’s provocative language about “breeding” and “masters and slaves” was intended to enhance culture through competition, it is still an open question how and when Shaw supported biological eugenics. Via Nietzsche’s “philosophical breeding,” this article presents a new reading of Shaw’s Man and Superman: on the one hand, it contrasts Nietzsche’s philosophical Übermensch with Shaw’s eugenic Superman; and on the other hand, it connects Nietzsche’s agonistic enhancement of culture with Shaw’s philosophical reflections in “Don Juan in Hell.” In contrast to Tanner’s support of eugenic breeding in his Revolutionist’s Handbook, Shaw’s Don Juan remarkably resembles Nietzsche’s notion of “philosophical breeding” toward a more competent, truthful, and autonomous orientation that is needed in increasingly complex global politics.","PeriodicalId":40781,"journal":{"name":"Shaw-The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies","volume":"166 3","pages":"183 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shaw-The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/shaw.39.2.0183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Nietzsche and Shaw are famous and infamous: famous for their innovative and influential forms of writing, but infamous for their apparent support of totalitarianism and Nazism. However, while it has long been shown that Nietzsche’s provocative language about “breeding” and “masters and slaves” was intended to enhance culture through competition, it is still an open question how and when Shaw supported biological eugenics. Via Nietzsche’s “philosophical breeding,” this article presents a new reading of Shaw’s Man and Superman: on the one hand, it contrasts Nietzsche’s philosophical Übermensch with Shaw’s eugenic Superman; and on the other hand, it connects Nietzsche’s agonistic enhancement of culture with Shaw’s philosophical reflections in “Don Juan in Hell.” In contrast to Tanner’s support of eugenic breeding in his Revolutionist’s Handbook, Shaw’s Don Juan remarkably resembles Nietzsche’s notion of “philosophical breeding” toward a more competent, truthful, and autonomous orientation that is needed in increasingly complex global politics.
“人性的孕育”:尼采与萧伯纳的《人与超人》
摘要:尼采和萧伯纳既出名又不出名:他们以创新和有影响力的写作形式而闻名,但他们显然支持极权主义和纳粹主义而臭名昭著。然而,尽管尼采关于“繁殖”和“主人与奴隶”的挑衅性语言是为了通过竞争来提升文化,但肖是如何以及何时支持生物优生学的,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。本文通过尼采的“哲学教养”,对萧伯纳的《人与超人》进行了新的解读:一方面,将尼采的哲学Übermensch与萧伯纳的优生超人进行了对比;另一方面,它将尼采对文化的激烈提升与萧伯纳在《地狱中的唐璜》中的哲学思考联系起来。与坦纳在《革命者手册》中对优生育种的支持形成鲜明对比的是,萧伯纳的《唐璜》非常类似于尼采的“哲学育种”概念,即朝着更有能力、更真实、更自主的方向发展,这是日益复杂的全球政治所需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信