CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL FORMS FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF PETTY CRIME IN SERBIAN AND GERMAN LAW

Ivan Đokić, Dragana Čvorović
{"title":"CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL FORMS FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF PETTY CRIME IN SERBIAN AND GERMAN LAW","authors":"Ivan Đokić, Dragana Čvorović","doi":"10.47152/rkkp.59.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the paper is the analysis of solutions that exist in Serbian and German criminal procedural law and refer to cases in which the public prosecutor in the field of petty crime is authorized to act towards adult perpetrators in accordance with the principle of opportunity of criminal prosecution. In relation to one variant of this principle, which implies conditional and temporary restraint of criminal prosecution, there is a distinct similarity in both mentioned legislations. However, with regard to the classic form of this procedural principle, which enables the public prosecutor to refrain prosecution for reasons of expediency, where he primarily values the public interest in prosecuting, there is a striking difference, because our criminal procedural law does not allow such a variant of the principle of opportunity of criminal prosecution. This difference is a consequence of a different criminal policy approach, because while in German criminal law the problem of petty crime is solved exclusively by procedural mechanisms, in Serbian criminal law, in addition to procedural law, there are also appropriate instruments in the substantive criminal law.","PeriodicalId":85724,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.59.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the paper is the analysis of solutions that exist in Serbian and German criminal procedural law and refer to cases in which the public prosecutor in the field of petty crime is authorized to act towards adult perpetrators in accordance with the principle of opportunity of criminal prosecution. In relation to one variant of this principle, which implies conditional and temporary restraint of criminal prosecution, there is a distinct similarity in both mentioned legislations. However, with regard to the classic form of this procedural principle, which enables the public prosecutor to refrain prosecution for reasons of expediency, where he primarily values the public interest in prosecuting, there is a striking difference, because our criminal procedural law does not allow such a variant of the principle of opportunity of criminal prosecution. This difference is a consequence of a different criminal policy approach, because while in German criminal law the problem of petty crime is solved exclusively by procedural mechanisms, in Serbian criminal law, in addition to procedural law, there are also appropriate instruments in the substantive criminal law.
塞尔维亚和德国法律中解决轻罪问题的刑事诉讼形式
本文的主题是分析塞尔维亚和德国刑事诉讼法中存在的解决办法,并涉及在轻微犯罪领域授权检察官根据刑事起诉机会原则对成年犯罪者采取行动的案件。关于这一原则的一个变体,即有条件和暂时限制刑事起诉,上述两项立法有明显的相似之处。然而,就这一程序原则的经典形式而言,这一原则使检察官能够出于权宜之计而不起诉,因为他主要重视起诉的公共利益,这一形式有显著的不同,因为我们的刑事诉讼法不允许刑事起诉机会原则的这种变体。这种差别是不同的刑事政策办法的结果,因为在德国刑法中,轻微犯罪的问题完全是通过程序机制解决的,而在塞尔维亚刑法中,除了程序法之外,在实体刑法中也有适当的文书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信