Innocent Until Born: Why Prisons Should Stop Shackling Pregnant Women to Protect the Child

M. Kalmanson
{"title":"Innocent Until Born: Why Prisons Should Stop Shackling Pregnant Women to Protect the Child","authors":"M. Kalmanson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2742842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of American prisons to shackle and otherwise restrain incarcerated, pregnant women is problematic for several reasons. Such practices include shackling, chaining, and handcuffing pregnant inmates during their third trimester, transportation to/from medical facilities, labor and delivery, and postpartum recovery. Current discourse on this topic focuses primarily on how the practices invade the woman’s civil liberties, Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment, and international human rights. Recent case law vindicates policy rationales for such practices — safety of others, safety of the woman herself, and securing flight risks. What these discussions oversee and this paper confronts the State’s interests in fetal rights and then, after birth, the child’s rights as a constitutionally protected person. Shifting the shackling discussion to protecting the child, this paper argues that shackling policies should be banned in all American institutions.","PeriodicalId":81266,"journal":{"name":"Florida State University law review. Florida State University. College of Law","volume":"30 1","pages":"851-882"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.2742842","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florida State University law review. Florida State University. College of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2742842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practice of American prisons to shackle and otherwise restrain incarcerated, pregnant women is problematic for several reasons. Such practices include shackling, chaining, and handcuffing pregnant inmates during their third trimester, transportation to/from medical facilities, labor and delivery, and postpartum recovery. Current discourse on this topic focuses primarily on how the practices invade the woman’s civil liberties, Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment, and international human rights. Recent case law vindicates policy rationales for such practices — safety of others, safety of the woman herself, and securing flight risks. What these discussions oversee and this paper confronts the State’s interests in fetal rights and then, after birth, the child’s rights as a constitutionally protected person. Shifting the shackling discussion to protecting the child, this paper argues that shackling policies should be banned in all American institutions.
《无辜到出生:为什么监狱应该停止为保护孩子而给孕妇戴上镣铐
美国监狱给被监禁的孕妇戴上镣铐或以其他方式加以约束的做法存在问题,原因如下。这些做法包括在怀孕晚期给怀孕囚犯戴上脚镣、脚链和手铐、往返医疗设施、分娩和分娩以及产后康复。目前关于这一话题的讨论主要集中在这些做法如何侵犯妇女的公民自由、第八修正案反对残酷和不寻常惩罚的权利以及国际人权。最近的判例法证明了这种做法的政策依据——他人的安全、女性自身的安全以及防范逃跑风险。这些讨论所监督的和本文所面对的是国家在胎儿权利方面的利益,然后是出生后,儿童作为受宪法保护的人的权利。本文将束缚的讨论转移到保护儿童上,认为束缚政策应该在所有美国机构中被禁止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书