Comparative study on equivalent models calculating magnetic force between permanent magnets

Yuyang Zhang, Y. Leng, Hao Zhang, Xukun Su, Shuailing Sun, Xiaoyu Chen, Junjie Xu
{"title":"Comparative study on equivalent models calculating magnetic force between permanent magnets","authors":"Yuyang Zhang, Y. Leng, Hao Zhang, Xukun Su, Shuailing Sun, Xiaoyu Chen, Junjie Xu","doi":"10.1108/jimse-09-2020-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAn appropriate equivalent model is the key to the effective analysis of the system and structure in which permanent magnet takes part. At present, there are several equivalent models for calculating the interacting magnetic force between permanent magnets including magnetizing current, magnetic charge and magnetic dipole–dipole model. How to choose the most appropriate and efficient model still needs further discussion.Design/methodology/approachThis paper chooses cuboid, cylindrical and spherical permanent magnets as calculating objects to investigate the detailed calculation procedures based on three equivalent models, magnetizing current, magnetic charge and magnetic dipole–dipole model. By comparing the accuracies of those models with experiment measurement, the applicability of three equivalent models for describing permanent magnets with different shapes is analyzed.FindingsSimilar calculation accuracies of the equivalent magnetizing current model and magnetic charge model are verified by comparison between simulation and experiment results. However, the magnetic dipole–dipole model can only accurately calculate for spherical magnet instead of other nonellipsoid magnets, because dipole model cannot describe the specific characteristics of magnet's shape, only sphere can be treated as the topological form of a dipole, namely a filled dot.Originality/valueThis work provides reference basis for choosing a proper model to calculate magnetic force in the design of electromechanical structures with permanent magnets. The applicability of different equivalent models describing permanent magnets with different shapes is discussed and the equivalence between the models is also analyzed.","PeriodicalId":34604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing and Special Equipment","volume":"50 s249","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jimse-09-2020-0009","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing and Special Equipment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jimse-09-2020-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

PurposeAn appropriate equivalent model is the key to the effective analysis of the system and structure in which permanent magnet takes part. At present, there are several equivalent models for calculating the interacting magnetic force between permanent magnets including magnetizing current, magnetic charge and magnetic dipole–dipole model. How to choose the most appropriate and efficient model still needs further discussion.Design/methodology/approachThis paper chooses cuboid, cylindrical and spherical permanent magnets as calculating objects to investigate the detailed calculation procedures based on three equivalent models, magnetizing current, magnetic charge and magnetic dipole–dipole model. By comparing the accuracies of those models with experiment measurement, the applicability of three equivalent models for describing permanent magnets with different shapes is analyzed.FindingsSimilar calculation accuracies of the equivalent magnetizing current model and magnetic charge model are verified by comparison between simulation and experiment results. However, the magnetic dipole–dipole model can only accurately calculate for spherical magnet instead of other nonellipsoid magnets, because dipole model cannot describe the specific characteristics of magnet's shape, only sphere can be treated as the topological form of a dipole, namely a filled dot.Originality/valueThis work provides reference basis for choosing a proper model to calculate magnetic force in the design of electromechanical structures with permanent magnets. The applicability of different equivalent models describing permanent magnets with different shapes is discussed and the equivalence between the models is also analyzed.
永磁体间磁力等效模型的比较研究
目的建立合适的等效模型是有效分析永磁体所处的系统和结构的关键。目前,计算永磁体间相互作用磁力的等效模型有磁化电流、磁荷和磁偶极-偶极模型。如何选择最合适、最有效的模式还有待进一步探讨。本文以长方体、圆柱形和球形永磁体为计算对象,研究了基于磁化电流、磁荷和磁偶极-偶极模型三种等效模型的详细计算方法。通过与实验测量的精度比较,分析了三种等效模型对不同形状永磁体的适用性。通过仿真与实验结果的比较,验证了等效磁化电流模型与磁荷模型的计算精度相近。然而,磁偶极子-偶极子模型只能准确计算球形磁体,而不能准确计算其他非椭球体磁体,因为偶极子模型不能描述磁体形状的具体特征,只有球体可以作为偶极子的拓扑形式,即填充点。独创性/价值本工作为永磁体机电结构设计中选择合适的磁力计算模型提供参考依据。讨论了描述不同形状永磁体的不同等效模型的适用性,并分析了模型之间的等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书