Social Purpose Increases Direct-to-Borrower Microfinance Investments by Reducing Physiologic Arousal

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Adriana Kraig, C. Cornelis, Elizabeth T. Terris, M. Neubert, Matthew S. Wood, Jorge A. Barraza, P. Zak
{"title":"Social Purpose Increases Direct-to-Borrower Microfinance Investments by Reducing Physiologic Arousal","authors":"Adriana Kraig, C. Cornelis, Elizabeth T. Terris, M. Neubert, Matthew S. Wood, Jorge A. Barraza, P. Zak","doi":"10.1037/npe0000091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Websites offering microfinance loans have become an increasingly popular form of investment. However, it is unclear why some projects offered on sites such as Kiva.org, Microplace.com, and Lendforpeace.org are more successful at meeting funding goals than others. The present article reports the results of an experiment to test if communicating social purpose enhances investment appeal and the neurophysiological mechanism through which this effect occurs. By connecting physiological and behavioral responses to microfinance requests for 101 participants, we found that investments with a social purpose, compared with those that were self-focused, received 25% more loans. Social purpose requests were associated with a significant reduction in two measures of physiologic arousal, resulted in greater empathic concern, and produced stronger negative affect compared with self-focused requests. These factors were largely driven by responses by women, who invested 90% more money to requests overall and 97% more to social purpose requests than did men. Our findings indicate that communicating social purpose is an effective way to attract more investment to entrepreneurs in developing countries.","PeriodicalId":45695,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","volume":"138 45","pages":"116–126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Websites offering microfinance loans have become an increasingly popular form of investment. However, it is unclear why some projects offered on sites such as Kiva.org, Microplace.com, and Lendforpeace.org are more successful at meeting funding goals than others. The present article reports the results of an experiment to test if communicating social purpose enhances investment appeal and the neurophysiological mechanism through which this effect occurs. By connecting physiological and behavioral responses to microfinance requests for 101 participants, we found that investments with a social purpose, compared with those that were self-focused, received 25% more loans. Social purpose requests were associated with a significant reduction in two measures of physiologic arousal, resulted in greater empathic concern, and produced stronger negative affect compared with self-focused requests. These factors were largely driven by responses by women, who invested 90% more money to requests overall and 97% more to social purpose requests than did men. Our findings indicate that communicating social purpose is an effective way to attract more investment to entrepreneurs in developing countries.
社会目的通过减少生理唤起增加直接面向借款人的小额信贷投资
提供小额贷款的网站已经成为一种越来越受欢迎的投资形式。然而,目前尚不清楚为什么Kiva.org、Microplace.com和Lendforpeace.org等网站上提供的一些项目比其他项目更能成功地实现融资目标。本文报告了一项实验的结果,以测试沟通社会目的是否会提高投资吸引力,以及这种效应发生的神经生理机制。通过将101名参与者的生理和行为反应与小额贷款请求联系起来,我们发现,与以自我为中心的投资相比,以社会为目的的投资获得的贷款多25%。与以自我为中心的请求相比,社会目的请求与两项生理唤醒指标的显著降低有关,导致更大的共情关注,并产生更强的负面影响。这些因素在很大程度上是由女性的回应推动的,她们在总体请求上的投入比男性多90%,在社交目的请求上的投入比男性多97%。我们的研究结果表明,传播社会目的是发展中国家企业家吸引更多投资的有效途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信