Investigating Technology Transfer Gaps Through Farmers Field School

Q4 Multidisciplinary
E. Dalampira, Ioannis Tsoukalidis, D. Lazaridou, Smaragda Nikouli, Anastasios Livadiotis, A. Michailidis
{"title":"Investigating Technology Transfer Gaps Through Farmers Field School","authors":"E. Dalampira, Ioannis Tsoukalidis, D. Lazaridou, Smaragda Nikouli, Anastasios Livadiotis, A. Michailidis","doi":"10.24818/ejis.2022.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technology transfer is one of the core elements in a rapidly changing agricultural sector. However, the booming of agricultural innovation is not followed by the generation of methodological tools able to diffuse innovation in farmers and other stakeholders. For the last decades, Farmers Field School (FFS) approach is offering technology transfer and co-generation, infused by agricultural extension. Traditional FFS form is a learning by doing method and farmers are learning from other experienced farmers. Even though FFS has various forms which are trying to cover gaps between science and practice, there are still different methodological challenges in each FFS form. In this research, we propose a Hybrid FFS strategy, assembled by the strengths of various FFS forms and trying to close these gaps. We review and implement a metaanalysis of FFS forms, investigating these gaps. Afterwards, a comprehensive, holistic and dynamic conceptual and methodological model, derived from meta-analysis is proposed to cover the technology transfer methodological gaps. Our Hybrid FFS strategy highlight strategic questions which offer the appropriate background for establishing a strong educational strategy and overcome possible challenges. \"Learning by doing\" is supported from farmers to farmers as well as from experts to experts. Various stakeholders from value chain are promoted to use and be familiarized with new technologies, practical tools and the internet, as well as develop their managerial skills in value chain products. Modules cover the gaps ofrecent FFS approaches, by incorporating issues of sustainability and certification of value chain products, with business and entrepreneurship. Flexibility of a hybrid (virtual and physical) environment resolve complex situations (i.e. COVID-19). This methodology can be useful to policy makers managers or agricultural extension researchers, in order to construct, implement and evaluate an FFS agricultural program. Hybrid FFS strategy describes how agricultural education approaches of the past can create educational environments of the future and lead learning accelerators in agricultural sector.","PeriodicalId":36073,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/ejis.2022.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Technology transfer is one of the core elements in a rapidly changing agricultural sector. However, the booming of agricultural innovation is not followed by the generation of methodological tools able to diffuse innovation in farmers and other stakeholders. For the last decades, Farmers Field School (FFS) approach is offering technology transfer and co-generation, infused by agricultural extension. Traditional FFS form is a learning by doing method and farmers are learning from other experienced farmers. Even though FFS has various forms which are trying to cover gaps between science and practice, there are still different methodological challenges in each FFS form. In this research, we propose a Hybrid FFS strategy, assembled by the strengths of various FFS forms and trying to close these gaps. We review and implement a metaanalysis of FFS forms, investigating these gaps. Afterwards, a comprehensive, holistic and dynamic conceptual and methodological model, derived from meta-analysis is proposed to cover the technology transfer methodological gaps. Our Hybrid FFS strategy highlight strategic questions which offer the appropriate background for establishing a strong educational strategy and overcome possible challenges. "Learning by doing" is supported from farmers to farmers as well as from experts to experts. Various stakeholders from value chain are promoted to use and be familiarized with new technologies, practical tools and the internet, as well as develop their managerial skills in value chain products. Modules cover the gaps ofrecent FFS approaches, by incorporating issues of sustainability and certification of value chain products, with business and entrepreneurship. Flexibility of a hybrid (virtual and physical) environment resolve complex situations (i.e. COVID-19). This methodology can be useful to policy makers managers or agricultural extension researchers, in order to construct, implement and evaluate an FFS agricultural program. Hybrid FFS strategy describes how agricultural education approaches of the past can create educational environments of the future and lead learning accelerators in agricultural sector.
通过农民田间学校调查技术转移差距
技术转让是迅速变化的农业部门的核心要素之一。然而,随着农业创新的蓬勃发展,并没有产生能够在农民和其他利益相关者中传播创新的方法工具。在过去的几十年里,农民田间学校(FFS)的方法提供了技术转让和热电联产,并融入了农业推广。传统的农民田间FFS形式是一种边做边学的方法,农民正在向其他有经验的农民学习。尽管农民田间学校有各种形式,试图弥补科学与实践之间的差距,但每种形式的农民田间学校仍然存在不同的方法挑战。在本研究中,我们提出了一种混合FFS战略,结合各种FFS形式的优势,试图缩小这些差距。我们审查并实施了FFS表格的荟萃分析,调查这些差距。在此基础上,提出了一个综合的、整体的、动态的概念和方法模型,以弥补技术转移方法论的空白。我们的混合型FFS战略突出了战略问题,为建立强有力的教育战略和克服可能的挑战提供了适当的背景。“边做边学”得到了农民对农民以及专家对专家的支持。促进来自价值链的各种利益相关者使用和熟悉新技术,实用工具和互联网,并发展他们对价值链产品的管理技能。模块通过将价值链产品的可持续性和认证问题与商业和创业精神结合起来,弥补了最近FFS方法的差距。混合(虚拟和物理)环境的灵活性可解决复杂情况(如COVID-19)。该方法可为政策制定者、管理人员或农业推广研究人员构建、实施和评估田间FFS农业项目提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信