{"title":"Technology commitment and strategic resource pricing","authors":"Ali M. Khadr","doi":"10.1016/0165-0572(92)90007-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines optimal pricing strategies by a resource seller when endogenously-determined investment by users in resource-specific technologies creates a ‘lagged’ resource demand structure. The analysis reveals that: (i) if the seller can credibly pre-commit to a resource price path at the initial date, the optimal path features ‘high’ prices at the outset, followed by ‘low’ prices over a subsequent interval and an ‘intermediate’ long-run price; (ii) a subgame-perfect equilibrium in feedback strategies features consistently ‘high’ prices and makes both seller and users worse off in the long run; but (iii) a subgame perfect equilibrium in trigger strategies can sustain the same outcome as the precommitment equilibrium.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101080,"journal":{"name":"Resources and Energy","volume":"14 3","pages":"Pages 215-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(92)90007-4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165057292900074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines optimal pricing strategies by a resource seller when endogenously-determined investment by users in resource-specific technologies creates a ‘lagged’ resource demand structure. The analysis reveals that: (i) if the seller can credibly pre-commit to a resource price path at the initial date, the optimal path features ‘high’ prices at the outset, followed by ‘low’ prices over a subsequent interval and an ‘intermediate’ long-run price; (ii) a subgame-perfect equilibrium in feedback strategies features consistently ‘high’ prices and makes both seller and users worse off in the long run; but (iii) a subgame perfect equilibrium in trigger strategies can sustain the same outcome as the precommitment equilibrium.