When a unit of insulin is not a unit: Detemir dosing and insulin cost in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Christopher K. Johnson BS, Mona Shimshi MD
{"title":"When a unit of insulin is not a unit: Detemir dosing and insulin cost in type 2 diabetes mellitus","authors":"Christopher K. Johnson BS,&nbsp;Mona Shimshi MD","doi":"10.1016/S1557-0843(09)80017-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background</strong>: Increasing acceptance of basal-bolus insulin therapy for the control of diabetes mellitus (DM) has led to newer formulations of basal insulin analogues. The newest one is detemir.</p><p><strong>Objectives</strong>: Clinical evidence suggests that patients with type 2 DM require higher doses of detemir than other basal insulins to achieve equivalent glycemic control. This study examines evidence for greater dosing requirements and the implications of higher doses on the cost of insulin treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: We performed a MEDLINE search for randomized, prospective studies comparing detemir with other basal insulins in patients with type 2 DM that were published in English between January 2000 and November 2008. The mean daily doses of basal and bolus insulin and the mean total daily insulin doses were determined. Overall weighted mean doses of the insulins were used to estimate the mean total daily insulin doses required for a 100-kg patient, and published 2008 US retail prices were used to estimate the retail costs of basal-bolus and basal-only insulin regimens.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Seven trials involving 3311 patients were identified in the literature search. The mean total daily insulin dose was 0.80 unit/kg for detemir-based regimens and 0.58 unit/kg for comparison regimens. For basal-bolus regimens, the estimated retail cost of the mean total daily insulin dose was $11.24 for detemir-based regimens compared with $8.99 for glargine-based regimens and $6.41 for neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-based insulins. For basal-only regimens, the estimated retail cost of the mean total daily insulin dose was $8.23 for detemir compared with $5.19 for glargine and $2.35 for NPH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: It is important for health care providers and patients to know that patients with type 2 DM may require substantially higher doses of detemir than other basal insulins. This should be considered when titrating the dose as well as in cost-benefit analyses of detemir versus other insulins.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100678,"journal":{"name":"Insulin","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1557-0843(09)80017-1","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insulin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557084309800171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Increasing acceptance of basal-bolus insulin therapy for the control of diabetes mellitus (DM) has led to newer formulations of basal insulin analogues. The newest one is detemir.

Objectives: Clinical evidence suggests that patients with type 2 DM require higher doses of detemir than other basal insulins to achieve equivalent glycemic control. This study examines evidence for greater dosing requirements and the implications of higher doses on the cost of insulin treatment.

Methods: We performed a MEDLINE search for randomized, prospective studies comparing detemir with other basal insulins in patients with type 2 DM that were published in English between January 2000 and November 2008. The mean daily doses of basal and bolus insulin and the mean total daily insulin doses were determined. Overall weighted mean doses of the insulins were used to estimate the mean total daily insulin doses required for a 100-kg patient, and published 2008 US retail prices were used to estimate the retail costs of basal-bolus and basal-only insulin regimens.

Results: Seven trials involving 3311 patients were identified in the literature search. The mean total daily insulin dose was 0.80 unit/kg for detemir-based regimens and 0.58 unit/kg for comparison regimens. For basal-bolus regimens, the estimated retail cost of the mean total daily insulin dose was $11.24 for detemir-based regimens compared with $8.99 for glargine-based regimens and $6.41 for neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-based insulins. For basal-only regimens, the estimated retail cost of the mean total daily insulin dose was $8.23 for detemir compared with $5.19 for glargine and $2.35 for NPH.

Conclusions: It is important for health care providers and patients to know that patients with type 2 DM may require substantially higher doses of detemir than other basal insulins. This should be considered when titrating the dose as well as in cost-benefit analyses of detemir versus other insulins.

当一个单位的胰岛素不是一个单位时:2型糖尿病患者的Detemir给药和胰岛素成本
背景:越来越多的人接受基础推注胰岛素治疗来控制糖尿病(DM),这导致了基础胰岛素类似物的新配方。最新的一位是埃米尔。目的:临床证据表明,2型糖尿病患者需要比其他基础胰岛素更高剂量的地特胰岛素才能实现同等的血糖控制。这项研究考察了更高剂量要求的证据,以及更高剂量对胰岛素治疗成本的影响。方法:我们对2000年1月至2008年11月以英文发表的2型糖尿病患者使用地特胰岛素和其他基础胰岛素的随机前瞻性研究进行了MEDLINE检索。测定基础胰岛素和推注胰岛素的平均每日剂量以及平均每日总胰岛素剂量。使用胰岛素的总体加权平均剂量来估计100kg患者所需的平均每日总胰岛素剂量,并使用2008年公布的美国零售价格来估计基础推注和仅基础胰岛素方案的零售成本。结果:在文献检索中确定了7项试验,涉及3311名患者。以地特为基础的方案的平均每日总胰岛素剂量为0.80单位/kg,比较方案为0.58单位/kg。对于基础推注方案,基于地特米尔的方案的平均每日总胰岛素剂量的估计零售成本为11.24美元,而基于甘精胰岛素的方案为8.99美元,基于中性鱼精蛋白-哈格多恩(NPH)的胰岛素为6.41美元。对于仅基础方案,地特胰岛素平均每日总剂量的估计零售成本为8.23美元,而甘精胰岛素为5.19美元,NPH为2.35美元。结论:对于医疗保健提供者和患者来说,重要的是要知道2型糖尿病患者可能需要比其他基础胰岛素更高剂量的地特胰岛素。在滴定剂量时以及在地特与其他胰岛素的成本效益分析中应考虑这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信