Lina M. Valencia‐Arango , Angélica P. Fajardo‐Escolar , Juan C. Segura‐Salguero , Santiago Sáenz‐Quispe , Carolina Rincón‐Restrepo , Adriana Posada , Vivian Ronderos , Ana H. Perea‐Bello
{"title":"Manejo anestésico de neonatos submetidos a cateterismo cardíaco diagnóstico e terapêutico: uma revisão sistemática da literatura","authors":"Lina M. Valencia‐Arango , Angélica P. Fajardo‐Escolar , Juan C. Segura‐Salguero , Santiago Sáenz‐Quispe , Carolina Rincón‐Restrepo , Adriana Posada , Vivian Ronderos , Ana H. Perea‐Bello","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Several interventional cardiology procedures are required in neonates with congenital heart disease. Interventional cardiology procedures have a higher risk of cardiac arrest compared to other interventions. At present, there is great heterogeneity in the perioperative management of congenital heart disease neonates undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization or therapeutic cardiac catheterization.</p></div><div><h3>Study objectives</h3><p>Primary aim: Provide a systematic review of the most effective and/or safe anesthetic and perioperative management in neonates with congenital heart disease who undergo diagnostic cardiac catheterization or therapeutic cardiac catheterization. Secondary aim: Identify the medications, monitoring parameters and airway management used in the same population.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic literature review.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Catheterization laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Literature was searched (December 2017) in electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, <em>BIREME‐Lilacs‐Biblioteca Virtual de la Salud</em>, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment Database.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>From 130 records identified, four studies met inclusion criteria and quality assessment. None of the studies were relevant to the primary objective. Regarding the secondary objectives, one study compared the efficacy and adverse effects of racemic ketamine and its S(+) ketamine enantiomer, one study reported the efficacy of subarachnoid anesthesia for high‐risk children undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization, one study identified the factors associated to high severity adverse events related to sedation, anesthesia and airway, and one study retrospectively analyzed cardiac catheterization procedures in neonates weighing less than 2.5 kg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There are no evidence‐based recommendations available for congenital heart disease neonates undergoing cardiac catheterization. More studies are required to evaluate the ideal anesthetic and perioperative management in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":"70 3","pages":"Pages 278-287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420303433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Several interventional cardiology procedures are required in neonates with congenital heart disease. Interventional cardiology procedures have a higher risk of cardiac arrest compared to other interventions. At present, there is great heterogeneity in the perioperative management of congenital heart disease neonates undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization or therapeutic cardiac catheterization.
Study objectives
Primary aim: Provide a systematic review of the most effective and/or safe anesthetic and perioperative management in neonates with congenital heart disease who undergo diagnostic cardiac catheterization or therapeutic cardiac catheterization. Secondary aim: Identify the medications, monitoring parameters and airway management used in the same population.
Design
Systematic literature review.
Setting
Catheterization laboratory.
Methods
Literature was searched (December 2017) in electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, BIREME‐Lilacs‐Biblioteca Virtual de la Salud, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment Database.
Main results
From 130 records identified, four studies met inclusion criteria and quality assessment. None of the studies were relevant to the primary objective. Regarding the secondary objectives, one study compared the efficacy and adverse effects of racemic ketamine and its S(+) ketamine enantiomer, one study reported the efficacy of subarachnoid anesthesia for high‐risk children undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization, one study identified the factors associated to high severity adverse events related to sedation, anesthesia and airway, and one study retrospectively analyzed cardiac catheterization procedures in neonates weighing less than 2.5 kg.
Conclusion
There are no evidence‐based recommendations available for congenital heart disease neonates undergoing cardiac catheterization. More studies are required to evaluate the ideal anesthetic and perioperative management in this population.
背景先天性心脏病新生儿需要进行多种心脏介入治疗。与其他干预措施相比,介入心脏病学程序有更高的心脏骤停风险。目前,先天性心脏病新生儿接受诊断性心导管或治疗性心导管的围手术期管理存在很大的异质性。研究目的主要目的:对接受诊断性心导管或治疗性心导管治疗的先天性心脏病新生儿的最有效和/或安全的麻醉和围手术期管理进行系统综述。次要目的:确定同一人群中使用的药物、监测参数和气道管理。设计系统文献综述。设置导管实验室。方法检索电子数据库Medline、EMBASE、ScienceDirect、BIREME‐Lilacs‐Biblioteca Virtual de la Salud、Cochrane系统评价数据库、效果评价摘要数据库和健康技术评估数据库中的文献(2017年12月)。主要结果从确定的130份记录中,有4项研究符合纳入标准和质量评估。没有一项研究与主要目标相关。关于次要目标,一项研究比较了外消旋氯胺酮及其S(+)氯胺酮对映体的疗效和不良反应,一项报告了蛛网膜下腔麻醉对接受诊断性心导管插入术的高危儿童的疗效,一项确定了与镇静、麻醉和气道相关的高严重不良事件的相关因素,一项研究回顾性分析了体重小于2.5 kg的新生儿的心导管插入术。结论对于接受心导管入术的先天性心脏病新生儿,没有基于证据的建议。需要更多的研究来评估这一人群的理想麻醉和围手术期管理。
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories:
-Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)-
Clinical information (case reports)-
Reviews-
Letters to the Editor-
Editorials.
The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician.
The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.